NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Robert Marshall - 16 September 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Robert Marshall
MINTO NSW 2566
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) and 126A(3)of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you aren’t a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 September 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pamela Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act provides a framework for the supervision of superannuation entities and their trustees, ensuring that these entities operate in a manner that safeguards the retirement savings of Australians. The SISA was introduced by the Parliament of Australia, with a policy objective to enhance the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation industry, thereby providing financial security for retirees. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who are not deemed fit and proper persons to manage superannuation funds, ensuring that only suitable individuals are entrusted with the significant responsibility of overseeing these funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates that manage superannuation entities. The Act's jurisdictional reach is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act. The Act's scope includes the disqualification of individuals who contravene its provisions, particularly those who are deemed unfit to hold positions of trust or responsibility within superannuation entities. The Act provides that the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify an individual if they are satisfied that the person has contravened the Act and is not a fit and proper person to continue in their role. The disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance and includes criminal penalties for those who knowingly act in a prohibited capacity post-disqualification. The Act also allows for the possibility of disqualification revocation under certain conditions and provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of notice. This notice of disqualification is subject to publication as a Notifiable Instrument under the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness of such actions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides the framework for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities. Under this Act, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify individuals from being trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act or if they are not considered fit and proper for the role. In this case, Robert Marshall has been disqualified under subsections 126A(1) and 126A(3) of the SISA due to multiple contraventions of the Act and his unfitness to manage superannuation entities (subsection 126A(6)).
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs, including the requirement for trustees and responsible officers to act in the best interests of the members of the superannuation entity. It also mandates that these individuals adhere to the provisions of the SISA and other related laws. Robert Marshall's disqualification under the SISA means that he is no longer permitted to act as a trustee or a responsible officer for any superannuation entity, a prohibition that takes immediate effect.
Failure to comply with the disqualification order can lead to significant legal consequences. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, knowing that they are disqualified. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years in jail. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of compliance with the disqualification provisions and the seriousness with which the law treats breaches of these obligations.
In addition to the immediate disqualification, Robert Marshall has the option to apply for the revocation of his disqualification under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. This can be initiated by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation or by Robert Marshall himself through a written application. Furthermore, if Robert Marshall is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, he has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider it under section 344 of the SISA, provided that the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and includes the reasons for the dissatisfaction.