| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
ROBERT DICKS KOLOFALE
REGENTS PARK NSW 2143
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 26 September 2019
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Ian Ross
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that funds are managed with integrity and in the best interests of members. The Act was introduced by the Parliament of Australia and aims to maintain the financial stability and proper management of superannuation funds. In the case of Robert Dicks Kolofale, the Commissioner of Taxation, through a delegate, has disqualified him from being involved in the management of superannuation entities due to multiple contraventions of the SISA. This disqualification serves as a deterrent against serious misconduct within the superannuation industry and is intended to protect the interests of superannuation members. The disqualification is effective immediately and, if not challenged within 21 days, will lead to enforcement of the prohibition against Mr. Kolofale acting in roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with severe penalties for non-compliance.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds, extending its jurisdiction throughout the Commonwealth of Australia. This Act specifically targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, aiming to uphold high standards of conduct and compliance within the superannuation industry. The disqualification provisions of the SISA are designed to address serious contraventions by barring individuals from participating in the management of superannuation funds. The Act’s jurisdictional reach is national, impacting all participants in the superannuation industry across the Commonwealth. Additionally, the Act allows for the disqualification to be revoked under certain conditions, providing a pathway for reinstatement if the grounds for disqualification are addressed. The notice of disqualification, such as that issued to Robert Dicks Kolofale, is published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public accountability. It is an offence under the SISA for a disqualified person to continue acting in a prohibited capacity, with potential penalties including up to two years in jail. The Act also provides recourse for those affected by disqualification decisions, allowing for reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving notice.
Key Provisions
The notice issued to Robert Dicks Kolofale under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a formal declaration of his disqualification, as per subsection 126A(1) and (6) of the Act. The disqualification arises due to the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation being satisfied that Mr. Kolofale has contravened the SISA on multiple occasions, with the severity of these contraventions warranting such a measure. The disqualification becomes effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice.
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals and entities involved in superannuation activities. For instance, section 126K of the SISA establishes that it is an offence for a disqualified person, who is aware of their disqualification, to serve or act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds any of these roles. This provision aims to prevent disqualified individuals from continuing to influence or manage superannuation funds, which could otherwise lead to further misconduct.
In terms of penalties and consequences, section 126K also outlines that knowingly acting in any of the prohibited capacities as a disqualified person is an offence. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act regards such breaches. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of this disqualification either on the initiative of the authorities or following a written application from Mr. Kolofale himself.
For those affected by the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. If Mr. Kolofale is dissatisfied with the decision, he can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision and must articulate the reasons he believes the decision to be incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the disqualification, offering a degree of procedural fairness.