NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Richard Shenton
BRUNSWICK WA 6224
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 20 September 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bernard Morrison
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues and ensure proper supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, particularly in relation to the administration and governance of superannuation entities. The Act provides the framework for the regulation and oversight of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation funds, with the overarching goal of protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA was introduced by the Australian Parliament, reflecting the Commonwealth's commitment to ensuring the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, which is a significant component of the nation's retirement income framework. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain high standards of conduct and competence among those who manage and oversee superannuation funds, thereby safeguarding the financial security of millions of Australians who rely on these funds for their retirement.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, specifically those who serve as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. This includes individuals like Mr. Richard Shenton who have been found not to be fit and proper persons to hold such positions. The Act operates on a Commonwealth level, thus its jurisdiction extends across Australia. Its application is not limited by state or territory boundaries and is uniformly enforced to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry nationwide. Any person disqualified under the Act, like Mr. Shenton, is prohibited from acting in the specified roles within superannuation entities and faces severe penalties, including imprisonment, if they contravene these restrictions. The Act also allows for the disqualification to be revoked either by the authority or through a written application from the disqualified person, and provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the outcome.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a significant piece of legislation aimed at ensuring the proper management of superannuation funds. Section 126A(6) of the SISA mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must provide a notice of disqualification to an individual deemed unfit to serve as a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. In this case, the notice was issued to Mr. Richard Shenton (subsection 126A(3)). The notice clarifies that Mr. Shenton has been disqualified from these roles due to concerns about his fitness to manage such responsibilities. This disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance (subsection 126A(7)).
The SISA imposes several obligations on the parties it governs, particularly those in fiduciary positions within superannuation entities. These roles include trustees, investment managers, and custodians. Under section 126K, it is a strict requirement that only fit and proper individuals can hold these positions. This ensures that those managing superannuation funds are accountable and adhere to the highest standards of conduct and fiduciary duty. The Act emphasizes that disqualified individuals should not participate in any capacity that involves managing or influencing the administration of superannuation entities.
Failure to comply with the disqualification notice can result in serious legal consequences. Section 126K stipulates that knowingly acting in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian while disqualified is an offence. This is a criminal offence, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The Act underscores the importance of adhering to disqualification orders by imposing significant penalties for non-compliance. Such stringent measures are intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry.
In addition to the disqualification notice, the SISA provides mechanisms for individuals to seek reconsideration of the decision if they believe it to be unjust. Under section 344, affected individuals have the right to request a review of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and include the reasons why the individual believes the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a process for appealing disqualification decisions, providing a level of fairness and procedural justice to those affected by the decision. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified person.