NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Reham Abdallah - 23 February 2026
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Reham Abdallah
GLEN IRIS VIC 3146
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature, number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 February 2026
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a comprehensive framework for the regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing the need for robust oversight to protect superannuation funds and beneficiaries. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to ensure that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities adhere to high standards of conduct and compliance, thereby safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and stability of the superannuation industry, which is critical given the significant role superannuation plays in the Australian economy and in providing for the retirement and financial security of individuals.
Under the SISA, the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify individuals from being involved in the management of superannuation entities if they have been associated with entities that have contravened the Act. This power is exercised to deter misconduct and ensure that those who manage superannuation funds are fit and proper persons. The disqualification process involves a formal notice and an opportunity for the affected individual to seek reconsideration of the decision. Additionally, the Act provides for the publication of disqualification notices as Notifiable Instruments, enhancing transparency and accountability within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees managing superannuation entities. In this case, Reham Abdallah has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA due to serious contraventions by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities while she was a responsible officer. This disqualification prohibits Reham from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer of a body corporate that fulfils these roles. The disqualification is effective immediately upon notice and is subject to publication as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. Additionally, it is an offence under section 126K of the SISA for a disqualified person to continue in such roles, with penalties including up to two years in jail. The Commissioner may revoke the disqualification at their discretion or upon application by the disqualified person. Those dissatisfied with the decision have the right to request reconsideration within 21 days of receiving notice, as outlined in section 344 of the SISA.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides for the disqualification of responsible officers of corporate trustees who have contravened the Act. Section 126A(2) allows for disqualification if the officer was aware of the contraventions at the time they occurred, and the nature, number and seriousness of these contraventions justify the disqualification. Section 126A(6) requires that a notice of disqualification be given to the officer, as seen in the notice to Reham Abdallah, who has been disqualified under these provisions. The notice indicates that the disqualification is due to her role as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee who contravened the SISA.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties and entities it governs, ensuring compliance with superannuation regulations. For responsible officers, this includes a duty to prevent breaches of the SISA by their corporate trustees. They must act diligently to oversee the trustee’s compliance and take corrective action where necessary. Furthermore, entities such as corporate trustees are required to adhere to the standards set forth in the Act, including proper management of superannuation funds and transparent reporting to relevant authorities.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA can lead to significant legal consequences. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate involved in these roles. The maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance. This provision serves as a deterrent, ensuring that individuals and entities comply with the Act’s requirements to protect superannuation fund members.
Additionally, the Act allows for the revocation of a disqualification. According to subsection 126A(5), a disqualification can be revoked either by the authority that imposed it or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This provides a mechanism for individuals to potentially regain their eligibility to participate in the superannuation industry if they can demonstrate that the grounds for their disqualification no longer apply. If Reham Abdallah, for instance, wishes to seek revocation, she must submit a written application to the relevant authority.
Lastly, the Act provides a right of review for those affected by a disqualification decision. Section 344 allows a disqualified person to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be in writing and include the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This review process ensures that there is a formal avenue for challenging the disqualification, providing an opportunity for the affected party to present their case and seek rectification if they believe the decision was unjust.