NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Rapie Bilda
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Rapie Bilda
LAKEMBA NSW 2195
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 4 August 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed responsibly and in the best interest of members. The SISA is administered by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and was established by the Parliament of Australia to protect the retirement savings of Australians by imposing obligations on trustees, fund operators, and other related entities to ensure that superannuation funds are managed prudently and in compliance with legislative requirements. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and stability of the superannuation system, thereby safeguarding the retirement benefits of Australian workers. This notice of disqualification under the SISA highlights the legislative framework in place to enforce compliance and maintain the standards required within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and administration of superannuation funds within Australia, with a particular focus on trustees, responsible officers, and corporate trustees. The Act’s jurisdiction is nationwide, covering the entire Commonwealth of Australia, thereby encompassing state and territory boundaries. The Act targets the conduct and transactions of those managing superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with legislative standards to protect fund members' interests. Notably, the Act excludes certain types of superannuation funds and trustees from its purview, but this is not specified in the notice. Additionally, the application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, though specific details are not provided in the notice. This disqualification notice directly affects Rapie Bilda, indicating that they have been disqualified from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity due to breaches by the corporate trustee they were associated with during the contraventions.
Key Provisions
The notice provided under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines the disqualification of Rapie Bilda, who has been found to contravene the SISA as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities. This disqualification, which is effective from the date of the notice (subsection 126A(2)), is based on the grounds that the nature of the contraventions provides sufficient cause for the disqualification. The notice also includes the requirement for these details to be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette under subsection 126A(7).
Entities governed by the SISA, including responsible officers of corporate trustees, are subject to stringent obligations. They must ensure compliance with all provisions of the Act to avoid potential disqualification. The notice serves as a formal warning and reminder of the consequences of non-compliance, highlighting the importance of adhering to the legal standards set forth in the SISA. Moreover, under section 126K of the Act, it is a criminal offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, investment manager, or custodian of such an entity.
Failing to comply with the disqualification notice or acting in violation of the SISA can result in severe penalties. Under section 126K, the maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness of the contraventions. Additionally, the notice provides a pathway for potential revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5), which can occur either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified individual.
In cases where an individual is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse mechanism. The affected person can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and must clearly state the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect. This provision ensures that individuals have a formal process to challenge the decision if they believe it to be unjust or erroneous.