NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Ramesh Meepola Arachchige
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ramesh Meepola Arachchige
GIRRAWEEN NSW 2145
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 July 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide a comprehensive framework for the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry. The legislation was introduced to address the need for robust governance and oversight of superannuation funds to protect the interests of fund members and ensure the financial integrity of the industry. One of the key mechanisms under the SISA is the power to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act. This legislative tool is intended to deter misconduct and maintain high standards of conduct within the superannuation sector. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have engaged in serious contraventions, thereby safeguarding the superannuation system and the financial well-being of members. The policy objective is to foster trust and confidence in the superannuation industry by ensuring that only those with a demonstrated commitment to compliance and ethical standards are entrusted with the management of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a Commonwealth Act that applies to any individual or entity involved in the supervision, management, or administration of superannuation funds in Australia. This includes trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act's jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, affecting all entities and individuals operating within its supervisory scope. However, the Act provides for exclusions and exemptions in certain circumstances, such as for small APRA-regulated funds, self-managed superannuation funds, and public sector superannuation schemes. The Act's application can also be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, allowing for specific regulations and guidelines to be set by the Commissioner of Taxation or other authorised officials. The disqualification notice issued under this Act serves as a formal declaration that an individual has contravened the provisions of the SISA, warranting their disqualification from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions for disqualifying individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation funds, such as acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians. Under subsection 126A(2), an individual can be disqualified if there are grounds to believe they have contravened the Act and the seriousness of the contravention justifies such action. The disqualification is effective from the date the notice is issued, as stated in the notice given to Ramesh Meepola Arachchige.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on individuals who are subject to its provisions. For instance, under subsection 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that holds such roles. This prohibition is intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that only qualified and trustworthy individuals manage their superannuation funds.
In terms of penalties and consequences for breaches of the Act, subsection 126K imposes a significant penalty for any disqualified person who knowingly acts in the prohibited roles. The maximum penalty is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This provides a pathway for individuals to potentially regain their eligibility if circumstances change or if they can demonstrate compliance with the Act's requirements.
Finally, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for those affected by a disqualification decision to seek reconsideration. If an individual is dissatisfied with the decision, they can request the Commissioner to review it within 21 days of receiving notice. This request must be made in writing and should detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the decision, providing a level of due process for those subject to the Act's provisions.