NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Rachelle Innes – 9 September 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Rachelle Innes
EPPING NSW 2121
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 9 September 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen A Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for effective regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians adhere to high standards of conduct and competence. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament to establish a comprehensive framework governing the administration, regulation, and supervision of superannuation funds. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings and financial security of superannuation fund members.
The disqualification notice issued under the Act serves to prevent individuals who have contravened its provisions from participating in the management of superannuation entities, reflecting the legislative intent to uphold the standards and ethical requirements expected within the industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing roles that involve the management or oversight of superannuation entities if they are found to have breached the Act's provisions, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation members and maintaining the overall health of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds within Australia, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, governing the conduct of superannuation entities across all states and territories of Australia. The Act imposes stringent regulatory obligations and prohibits specific conduct to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. Notably, the Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, which may include regulations and rules that further detail the requirements and exceptions applicable to superannuation fund management. The Act includes provisions for disqualification of individuals who contravene its provisions, as evidenced in the notice issued to Rachelle Innes, which will also be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. Additionally, there are specific exclusions and exemptions that may apply, but these are not detailed in the provided notice. Individuals who knowingly act in a capacity prohibited by the Act after being disqualified face potential criminal penalties, including up to two years in jail.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions that enable the disqualification of individuals who contravene the Act. Specifically, subsection 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of a person if they have contravened the SISA on multiple occasions, and the number of contraventions provides grounds for such action. Subsection 126A(6) mandates that the Commissioner of Taxation must provide a notice of disqualification to the affected individual, which includes details of the contraventions and the effective date of the disqualification. In this instance, Rachelle Innes has been disqualified under this provision, as confirmed in the notice dated 9 September 2025, signed by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation.
The SISA imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. It requires trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities to adhere strictly to the provisions of the Act. Any contravention of the Act may lead to disqualification, as seen in Rachelle Innes's case. Additionally, section 126K of the SISA stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity, such as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian, within a superannuation entity if they are aware of their disqualification status. This underscores the importance of compliance and the serious consequences of non-compliance.
For breach of these provisions, the SISA imposes severe penalties. Section 126K outlines that any disqualified person who knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity is liable to criminal charges. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats such breaches. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) provides a mechanism for the potential revocation of disqualification, either initiated by the authorities or through a written application by the disqualified person. Lastly, section 344 allows for the reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected individual submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, providing reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision.