NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – RACHAEL SHIPLEY
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Rachael Shipley
LITTLEHAMPTON SA 5250
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provide grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 July 2021
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per John Macuz
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for better regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and beneficiaries. This legislation provides a framework for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, ensuring that they comply with the law and act in the best interests of the fund members. The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 is an Act of the Parliament of Australia. A key policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry by preventing individuals who have demonstrated unsuitability from being involved in the management of superannuation entities. This is achieved, in part, by empowering the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have acted in a manner that warrants such action, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Rachael Shipley.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, the Act applies to trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as to responsible officers of corporate trustees. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and notices, to ensure comprehensive coverage and enforcement. In this instance, Rachael Shipley has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA due to her role as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the Act. The disqualification prohibits her from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry, with specific penalties and the possibility of revocation under the Act's provisions. The notice of disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, and Rachael Shipley has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains specific provisions for disqualifying responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, a person can be disqualified if it is determined that the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA and the officer was responsible for the contraventions. In the case of Rachael Shipley, the Commissioner of Taxation has issued a notice of disqualification (subsection 126A(6)), stating that she has been disqualified as she was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions and the seriousness of the contraventions warrants her disqualification. This disqualification takes effect immediately upon its issuance.
The Act imposes certain obligations on parties it governs, particularly on responsible officers of corporate trustees. These officers must ensure that the corporate trustee complies with all provisions of the SISA. Failure to do so can result in personal disqualification as seen in Rachael Shipley's case. Additionally, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate in such a role. This reflects the Act's stringent approach to ensuring the integrity and proper management of superannuation entities.
Breaches of the Act's provisions can lead to serious consequences. Under section 126K, the maximum penalty for a disqualified person knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity is two years imprisonment. This highlights the gravity of non-compliance with the Act's requirements. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the disqualification to be revoked either by the Commissioner's initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person. However, if Rachael Shipley or any other disqualified person believes that their disqualification is unjust, they can request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344 of the SISA. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism for challenging the disqualification if grounds exist.