NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Pitovao Leaupepe
PUNCHBOWL NSW 2196
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 8 April 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia. It addresses the problem of misconduct and incompetence within the industry by providing a framework for the regulation, supervision, and enforcement against trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The policy objective of the Act is to protect the rights and interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that the industry operates efficiently, transparently, and in the best interests of the members. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals from holding positions of responsibility within the industry if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to delegate the power to disqualify individuals, as demonstrated in the provided notice of disqualification to Mrs Pitovao Leaupepe. The disqualification process, including the right to request reconsideration of the decision, is also outlined in the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities, which include trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act imposes obligations and duties on these entities and their officers to ensure compliance with superannuation laws and regulations. The Act extends to the entire Commonwealth of Australia, thereby applying uniformly across federal jurisdictions. The disqualification of Mrs Pitovao Leaupepe from serving as a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity is based on her contravention of the SIS Act, with the decision grounded on the nature and seriousness of the contraventions. The disqualification order, as communicated in the notice, takes immediate effect upon issuance. While the SIS Act provides for the possibility of revocation of such disqualification orders, it also outlines specific avenues for appeal or reconsideration by affected parties.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) pertinent to this disqualification notice are found in sections 126A, 126A(1), 126A(5), 126A(6), 126A(7), and 344. Section 126A(1) allows the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a superannuation entity if they are satisfied that the person has contravened the SIS Act and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions warrant such a disqualification. Section 126A(6) mandates that a written notice of the decision must be given to the affected person, and this notice must specify that the disqualification takes effect on the date of the notice. Section 126A(5) provides that the disqualification order may be revoked by the Commissioner either on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Section 126A(7) requires that details of the disqualification be published in the Gazette. Section 344 allows for a reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected person is dissatisfied with the disqualification and requests reconsideration within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Under the SIS Act, the obligations imposed on parties such as Mrs Pitovao Leaupepe, who is disqualified from being a trustee or a responsible officer, include adhering to the provisions of the Act and refraining from engaging in activities that could result in further contraventions. Mrs Leaupepe is required to ensure that she does not participate in any capacity that could lead to another breach of the SIS Act, given that she has already been found to have contravened it. Additionally, the Commissioner of Taxation is required to provide a written notice of disqualification, detail the reasons for the disqualification, and ensure that such details are published in the Gazette as stipulated by the Act.
The SIS Act includes provisions for penalties and consequences for breaches. Although specific penalties are not outlined in the notice itself, the Act generally allows for both civil and criminal penalties for breaches. Civil penalties can include fines up to $18,000 per contravention, while criminal penalties can result in fines of up to $210,000 for individuals and $1,050,000 for bodies corporate, along with potential imprisonment. For Mrs Leaupepe, the immediate consequence of her disqualification is that she is barred from holding a position of trust or responsibility within a superannuation entity. Failure to comply with this disqualification could lead to further penalties and legal consequences.