NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Peter Kitchen - 10 July 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Peter Kitchen
Pennington SA 5013
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 10 July 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry. This legislation was introduced to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act with integrity and comply with relevant laws. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the financial stability and integrity of the superannuation system, thereby protecting the retirement savings of Australians. In line with this objective, the Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry if they have contravened the Act’s provisions. This legislative measure is intended to deter non-compliance and uphold the standards necessary for the responsible management of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities in Australia. Specifically, it targets responsible officers of corporate trustees who oversee these entities. The Act’s jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth, ensuring a uniform regulatory approach to superannuation management. The disqualification under the SISA is triggered when a responsible officer is found to have contravened the Act, with the severity of the contravention determining the applicability of the disqualification. The Act allows for the disqualification to be revoked either by the Commissioner of Taxation or through a written application by the disqualified person. Notably, the Act also includes provisions for the publication of disqualification notices in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and accountability within the superannuation industry. Any person disqualified under the Act faces criminal penalties, including up to two years in jail, for continuing to act in a capacity that breaches the terms of their disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains various provisions, including subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6) which are pertinent in this context. Under subsection 126A(2), a person may be disqualified from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA, and the person was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. Subsection 126A(6) requires that a notice of this disqualification be given to the person concerned. In this case, Peter Kitchen has been disqualified under these provisions.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Primarily, it requires that responsible officers of corporate trustees ensure compliance with the SISA to avoid potential disqualification. The Act also mandates that any contraventions by the corporate trustee must be addressed promptly, and that the Commissioner of Taxation or their delegate must be informed of any disqualifications under subsection 126A(7). This notice is to be published in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and accountability within the superannuation industry.
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or body corporate that is involved with a superannuation entity. The seriousness of this offence is underscored by the potential penalty, which includes up to two years imprisonment. This serves as a deterrent against any attempts by disqualified individuals to continue their involvement in the management of superannuation entities.
There are several potential consequences for breaching these provisions. As noted, knowingly acting in a disqualified capacity is a criminal offence with a maximum penalty of two years in jail. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Finally, section 344 provides a mechanism for review, allowing the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if the disqualified person believes it to be incorrect, provided the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision.