NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – PETER JAMES PAGE - 15 November 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
PETER JAMES PAGE
STANSBURY SA 5582
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 15 November 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide comprehensive regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing the need for robust governance and protection of superannuation funds. The Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to ensure the proper administration, management, and regulation of superannuation funds, safeguarding the interests of superannuation members and beneficiaries. The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 aims to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by imposing stringent regulatory requirements on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The Act establishes a framework for the disqualification of individuals who engage in serious breaches of their duties, ensuring that the superannuation industry remains accountable and trustworthy.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds, specifically trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. This Act operates within the Commonwealth jurisdiction, thereby extending its reach across all states and territories in Australia. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions, particularly in cases where the contraventions are numerous and serious. Such disqualifications are communicated through a Notifiable Instrument and are published in the Federal Register of Legislation. Additionally, the Act outlines severe penalties for disqualified persons who continue to act in their former capacities, including potential imprisonment. The disqualification can be revoked at the discretion of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon application by the disqualified person. The Act also allows for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines several key provisions, most notably those related to the disqualification of individuals involved in superannuation entities. Specifically, under subsection 126A(6), a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify an individual if they are satisfied that the individual has contravened the SISA. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice, as seen in the notice provided to Peter James Page on 15 November 2024. This disqualification is based on the determination that the individual has breached the SISA in a manner that warrants such a serious consequence.
Under the SISA, being disqualified imposes significant obligations on the individual. Firstly, it prohibits the disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer or a body corporate involved in such capacities, as stated in section 126K. These roles are critical to the management and oversight of superannuation funds, and disqualifying an individual from these roles is intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members.
Breaching these provisions carries severe penalties. As outlined in section 126K, knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity while disqualified can result in criminal charges, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats the disqualification of individuals who have breached the law governing superannuation entities. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either by the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This provides a potential avenue for the individual to seek relief, provided they meet the conditions set out in the Act.
Lastly, if an individual is dissatisfied with the decision to disqualify them, they have the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner, as per section 344. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and must include the reasons why the individual believes the decision is incorrect. This process ensures that there is a mechanism for the individual to challenge the decision and seek redress if they believe it to be unjust.