NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Peter Hyunwoo Kim
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Peter Hyunwoo Kim
Holland Park West Qld 4121
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 7 July 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to establish a framework for the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation entities are managed in the best interests of their members. The Act addresses the problem of ensuring that superannuation funds are managed with integrity and competence, thereby protecting the retirement savings of millions of Australians. In line with the policy objective of maintaining high standards of governance and accountability within the superannuation sector, the Act includes provisions for the disqualification of responsible officers who are found to have engaged in misconduct or failed to uphold the necessary standards. This legislative measure aims to deter improper conduct and safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to entities and individuals involved in the management and operation of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act that applies across Australia. The Act's application is specifically targeted at those who breach its provisions, with the disqualification of individuals like Peter Hyunwoo Kim serving as a punitive measure for serious contraventions. The Act extends its reach through various provisions, including the power to disqualify responsible officers involved in contraventions and to publish details of such disqualifications in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. The Act also provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of disqualification by the Commissioner of Taxation. Notably, there are strict penalties for disqualified persons who continue to act in restricted capacities, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines various provisions related to the supervision of superannuation entities, including the process of disqualifying individuals from holding certain positions. In this case, subsection 126A(6) requires that a notice of disqualification be issued to Peter Hyunwoo Kim, stating that he has been disqualified as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee due to the trustee's contraventions of the SISA. This disqualification is effective from the date of the notice, which was issued on 7 July 2023 by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation.
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals like Peter Hyunwoo Kim who are responsible officers of a corporate trustee. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, these individuals must ensure compliance with the Act, and failure to do so, especially when serious contraventions occur, can lead to disqualification. This disqualification not only affects their current role but also restricts their ability to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of any superannuation entity in the future. The notice issued under subsection 126A(7) mandates that the details of this disqualification be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public awareness of such actions.
Section 126K of the SISA sets out serious consequences for breaches of the disqualification order. Specifically, it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue acting in any capacity that involves management or control of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is a two-year jail term. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of adhering to the disqualification and highlights the legal system's commitment to maintaining integrity within the superannuation industry.
Additionally, the SISA provides mechanisms for potential relief or reconsideration of the disqualification. Subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Peter Hyunwoo Kim. Furthermore, section 344 enables affected parties to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided they submit a written request outlining the reasons for their dissatisfaction. This process ensures that individuals have an avenue to contest the decision if they believe it to be unjust or based on incorrect information.