NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – PETER FLOATE - 7 February 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
PETER FLOATE
CLAREMONT MEADOWS NSW 2747
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 7 February 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament and aims to ensure the integrity and proper administration of superannuation entities. The Act seeks to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by imposing responsibilities on trustees and other officials to comply with legislative and regulatory requirements. One significant provision of the Act is the power to disqualify individuals from being involved in the management of superannuation entities if they have been responsible for serious contraventions of the Act, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation fund members. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain high standards of governance and accountability within the superannuation sector.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to the trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as responsible officers of corporate trustees, across the Commonwealth of Australia. This legislation aims to ensure that the superannuation industry is regulated and managed properly, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act applies to individuals who are responsible officers of corporate trustees and who have been involved in serious contraventions of the Act. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, applicable throughout Australia. There are no specific exclusions or exemptions outlined in the notice, but the Act does provide for various exclusions and exemptions in other sections, which would need to be examined for specific circumstances. The application of the Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations, which can provide further detail or clarification on specific provisions. In this case, the disqualification of Peter Floate is a direct application of the Act, with the notice of disqualification and potential for its revocation being elements managed under the legislative framework.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) pertinent to this notice are subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6). Subsection 126A(2) empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a responsible officer of a corporate trustee if the officer has contravened the SISA and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies such action. Subsection 126A(6) requires that the officer must be notified in writing of the disqualification. The notice must detail the reasons for the disqualification and inform the officer that they are disqualified from performing certain roles within superannuation entities.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties it governs include adherence to the provisions of the SISA. Specifically, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with the regulations governing superannuation entities. This encompasses a duty to act with integrity and to prevent the corporate trustee from engaging in activities that breach the SISA. The Act also mandates that any contraventions of the SISA must be reported and addressed promptly to avoid potential disqualification.
Under section 126K of the SISA, there are severe consequences for a disqualified person who knowingly acts in a capacity that they are prohibited from, such as being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The offence is punishable by up to two years in jail, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of disqualification orders. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
If Peter Floate is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, he has the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner under section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and should include the reasons for believing the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that the process is fair and that there is a mechanism for challenging the decision if there are grounds to do so.