NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Peter Elhage
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Peter Elhage
LIVERPOOL NSW 2170
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 9 October 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pamela Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the proper management and protection of superannuation funds. The Act aims to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by overseeing trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. This Act was introduced to address the problem of inadequate oversight and management within the superannuation industry, which could potentially harm the financial interests of superannuation fund members. The policy objective is to protect the rights and interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and other responsible officers comply with regulatory standards and act in the best interests of the members.
The SISA provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act's provisions while acting as responsible officers of superannuation entities. The enactment of the SISA by the Australian Parliament aims to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system and provide a framework for the regulation of superannuation entities and their officers. The legislative approach ensures that the financial security and interests of superannuation fund members are protected, thereby maintaining trust in the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to the management and oversight of superannuation funds within Australia, with the specific notice of disqualification provided under this Act targeting individuals like Peter Elhage who have been identified as responsible officers of corporate trustees contravening the Act’s provisions. The disqualification process under this Act is applicable nationally, with enforcement carried out by delegates of the Commissioner of Taxation. The Act’s jurisdiction extends to ensuring compliance with its regulations by any entity involved in the administration of superannuation entities, including corporate trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The notice of disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance, barring the disqualified individual from acting in their previous capacities within the superannuation industry. Any subsequent contraventions by a disqualified person, knowingly engaging in restricted activities, can lead to criminal penalties, including up to two years imprisonment. Additionally, the Act allows for the potential revocation of such disqualifications either on the initiative of the Commissioner or through a written application by the affected party, providing a mechanism for redress. Furthermore, affected individuals have the right to request reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals who have acted in a manner that justifies such action. Section 126A(2) permits the disqualification of a responsible officer when there has been a contravention of the SISA by the corporate trustee, and the seriousness of the contravention warrants this action. Section 126A(6) mandates that a formal notice of disqualification must be issued, as seen in the notice to Peter Elhage. The notice, dated 9 October 2023, states that Peter has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, because there was a contravention of the SISA by the corporate trustee for which Peter was responsible. The seriousness of these contraventions led to his disqualification.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on individuals such as Peter Elhage. As a responsible officer, Peter is required to ensure that the corporate trustee complies with all provisions of the SISA. This includes maintaining the proper management and operation of superannuation entities, avoiding any activities that might lead to a contravention of the Act. The disqualification notice underscores the failure to meet these obligations, resulting in the imposition of the disqualification. Additionally, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles. The seriousness of such actions is underscored by the potential for criminal penalties, including up to two years in jail.
The SISA also outlines the consequences for breach of its provisions. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to be, or act as, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. This offence carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment, reflecting the severity of the contraventions that led to the disqualification. Furthermore, section 126A(5) provides that the disqualification may be revoked either by the Commissioner on their own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified individual. Section 344 of the SISA allows for the reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected party submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, explaining why they believe the decision is incorrect. These provisions ensure that the Act’s requirements are enforced and that any breaches are met with appropriate sanctions.