NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ms Peala Manase
Punchbowl NSW 2196
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 6 March 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to address the need for stringent regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia. This Act was introduced to ensure that superannuation entities operate within a framework that protects the interests of superannuation fund members and maintains the integrity of the superannuation system. The enacting body was the Australian Parliament, which sought to establish a comprehensive regulatory scheme to prevent misconduct and mismanagement within the superannuation industry. The policy objective behind the SIS Act is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by imposing rigorous standards on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, thereby promoting trust and confidence in the superannuation system. This legislative initiative underscores the importance of regulatory oversight in maintaining the stability and reliability of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to trustees, responsible officers, and other persons involved in the management of superannuation entities within Australia. The Act provides a regulatory framework to ensure the proper administration of superannuation funds, covering all trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The Act's jurisdiction extends across the entire Commonwealth of Australia, applying uniformly to all states and territories. The legislation allows for the disqualification of individuals who contravene the Act, with the decision to disqualify being made by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The notice of disqualification, as illustrated in the gazette, applies to a specific individual, in this case, Ms Peala Manase, who has been found to have contravened the Act. The disqualification order, which takes immediate effect, prohibits the individual from serving as a trustee or responsible officer of any body corporate involved with superannuation entities. The Act also provides mechanisms for the review and potential revocation of disqualification orders, as well as avenues for appeal for those dissatisfied with the decision.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) relevant to this disqualification notice include subsection 126A(6) (which mandates the notice be given to the disqualified individual), subsection 126A(1) (which details the grounds for disqualification), and subsection 126A(7) (which requires the particulars of the disqualification to be published in the Gazette). Under subsection 126A(6) of the SIS Act, the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, in this case, Ivan Parrett, must give notice to the disqualified individual, Ms Peala Manase, that she has been disqualified from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that operates as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. This notice is a formal communication of the decision to disqualify her based on contraventions of the SIS Act.
The obligations imposed on Ms Peala Manase, as a party governed by the Act, include adhering to the regulations and standards set forth by the SIS Act. This includes ensuring compliance with fiduciary duties, proper management of superannuation funds, and avoiding any actions that may lead to contraventions of the Act. The disqualification order indicates that Ms Peala Manase has failed to meet these obligations, leading to the decision to disqualify her from her roles in the superannuation industry.
Under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act, Ms Peala Manase has been disqualified because it has been determined that she contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions, and the nature and seriousness of these contraventions justify the disqualification. The disqualification is effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice, as per the notice dated 6 March 2013. In addition to the immediate effect, subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act mandates that the particulars of the disqualification be published in the Gazette, ensuring transparency and public notification of the decision.
There are potential civil and criminal consequences for breach of the SIS Act, which include administrative penalties, fines, or imprisonment depending on the severity of the contravention. The disqualification itself is a significant consequence, barring Ms Peala Manase from participating in the management of superannuation entities. If she wishes to challenge the decision, she can request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, as outlined in section 344 of the SIS Act. The Commissioner may also revoke the disqualification order on their own initiative or upon a written application by Ms Peala Manase, as noted in subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act.