NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Paulette Siu
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Paulette Siu
BENOWA QLD 4217
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 August 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Adrian Avolio
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for regulatory oversight in the supervision of the superannuation industry. This Act provides a framework for ensuring that superannuation funds are managed in a way that protects the interests of members, and it was designed to fill the gap by establishing a regulatory regime overseen by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). The Parliament of Australia enacted this legislation to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by imposing standards on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The overarching policy objective is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by preventing mismanagement and misconduct within the industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued under the authority of the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) governs the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, with the aim of ensuring that superannuation funds are managed in the best interests of the fund members. The Act applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. It is a Commonwealth Act, and therefore, its jurisdictional reach is national, affecting all entities and persons operating within the superannuation industry across Australia. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who contravene its provisions, as evidenced by the notice issued to Paulette Siu. This disqualification prevents the individual from acting in any capacity that involves the management or oversight of superannuation entities. The Act also outlines the process for the revocation of such disqualifications and provides a recourse for those affected by the decision to seek reconsideration. Notably, the Act does not specify exclusions or thresholds for the disqualification provisions, implying that any contravention warranting disqualification is subject to the Commissioner's discretion.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) referenced in the notice of disqualification pertain to sections 126A and 126K. Section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the SISA in a manner that warrants such action. The notice indicates that the Commissioner of Taxation, through a delegate, has exercised this power and disqualified Paulette Siu. Section 126A(6) mandates that a notice be provided to the disqualified individual, which in this case is Paulette Siu, specifying the reason for disqualification. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice, as outlined in section 126A(6).
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the disqualified individual. Firstly, Paulette Siu is prohibited from acting or being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as from being a responsible officer or a body corporate fulfilling these roles within a superannuation entity, as per section 126K. These roles are critical in the administration and management of superannuation funds, and the disqualification aims to ensure that individuals with a history of serious contraventions do not hold such positions. Additionally, section 126A(7) stipulates that the details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public disclosure of the disqualification.
Breaching the disqualification provisions under section 126K is a serious matter. It is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the restricted roles mentioned, and the maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty reflects the importance of adhering to the regulations governing the superannuation industry to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or based on a written application by the disqualified person. For those who believe their disqualification is unjust, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided the request is made in writing and includes reasons for the perceived error in the decision.