| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To: Paul Moussalli
MALVERN EAST VIC 3145
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 17 October 2018
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per James Lange
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that it operates efficiently and responsibly. This legislation addresses the need to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by establishing a framework for the supervision and regulation of superannuation funds. The Act was introduced by the Parliament of Australia with the primary policy objective of safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation fund members, which is achieved through rigorous oversight and enforcement mechanisms. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have breached its provisions, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification issued to Paul Moussalli on 17 October 2018 by James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner. This notice, published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, signifies the enforcement of the Act's stringent measures against those who fail to comply with its requirements.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) governs the disqualification of individuals from involvement in superannuation entities, including roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian, to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. This Act applies to individuals who have been found to contravene the provisions of SISA, with the decision to disqualify being made by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The disqualification is immediate upon issuance, and the delegate's decision is supported by evidence of serious contraventions. Notably, the disqualification is published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency. Individuals who continue to act in prohibited roles after being disqualified face criminal penalties, including up to two years in jail. The Act also provides mechanisms for revocation of disqualification and reconsideration of decisions by the Commissioner, offering avenues for those affected to seek redress.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act. Section 126A(1) of the Act empowers the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person if they are satisfied that the person has contravened the Act and the seriousness of the contravention warrants such action. This was the basis for the disqualification notice issued to Paul Moussalli by James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, on 17 October 2018. The disqualification took immediate effect on the date of the notice.
The Act imposes certain obligations on individuals and entities to comply with its provisions. Trustees, investment managers, custodians, responsible officers, or bodies corporate that are involved with superannuation entities are required to adhere to the standards and rules set out in the SISA. This includes maintaining proper records, acting in the best interests of the members of the superannuation fund, and avoiding conflicts of interest. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in disciplinary action, including disqualification under section 126A.
The Act also includes provisions for offences and penalties. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or body corporate of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment. This penalty serves as a deterrent against non-compliance and ensures that individuals who have been disqualified do not continue to engage in activities that could harm members of superannuation funds.
The disqualification notice to Paul Moussalli also highlights the process for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the Act, the delegate may revoke the disqualification on their own initiative or upon written application by the disqualified person. Additionally, under section 344 of the Act, a person affected by the disqualification can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving notice. This provides an opportunity for the disqualified person to challenge the decision and potentially have the disqualification overturned if they can demonstrate that the decision was incorrect.