NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Paul Kelly
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Paul Kelly
SINGAPORE
I, Emma Rosenweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 September 2021
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide a framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, aiming to ensure that superannuation funds are managed in the best interests of members. The Act was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry to protect the financial interests and retirement security of superannuation fund members. The SISA establishes the framework for the operation, administration, and regulation of superannuation funds, including the disqualification of individuals who fail to comply with the regulatory requirements. In this instance, Paul Kelly has been disqualified from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry due to contraventions of the SISA, as determined by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system, safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration, management, and regulation of superannuation entities in Australia, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. This legislation extends to all superannuation entities operating within the Commonwealth jurisdiction, impacting both the financial services sector and the broader retirement industry. The Act aims to ensure the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by enforcing strict compliance standards and providing mechanisms for disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions. The geographic reach of the Act is national, and it encompasses all authorised superannuation funds, including industry, retail, and public sector funds. Subordinate instruments may further define and extend the application of the Act, but the primary legislation sets out the core principles and penalties for non-compliance. The disqualification of individuals such as Paul Kelly under this Act underscores the serious consequences of contravening superannuation laws, with penalties that include up to two years in jail for knowingly acting in a disqualified capacity.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to be involved in the management of superannuation funds. Section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of a person if it is determined that they have contravened the SISA and the nature of those contraventions justifies such a measure. In this case, Paul Kelly has been disqualified under subsection 126A(6) by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, Emma Rosenweig, who is satisfied that Mr. Kelly has contravened the SISA and that the nature of these contraventions warrants his disqualification. This disqualification takes immediate effect upon its issuance.
Under the SISA, the disqualification imposes significant restrictions on the individual, prohibiting them from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such a position for a superannuation entity (section 126K). These roles are critical in the management and oversight of superannuation funds, and the disqualification serves to protect the interests of fund members by removing individuals who have demonstrated unsuitability for these roles.
Failure to comply with the disqualification provisions is a criminal offence under section 126K of the SISA. A disqualified person who knowingly acts in any of the prohibited capacities can face severe penalties, including up to two years in jail. This underscores the seriousness of the disqualification and the importance of adhering to the restrictions imposed by the SISA.
In terms of redress, the SISA provides avenues for reconsideration of the disqualification decision. Under section 344, an affected person can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if they are dissatisfied with it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and should include the reasons why the person believes the decision is incorrect. Additionally, the SISA allows for the potential revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person (subsection 126A(5)). This offers a measure of flexibility and the possibility of reinstatement under certain conditions.