NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Paul Ingram
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Paul Ingram
ERINA NSW 2250
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 17 August 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and beneficiaries. The Act was introduced to address issues of misconduct and mismanagement within the superannuation sector, aiming to maintain the integrity and stability of the system. The SISA is administered by the Australian Government, with the Commissioner of Taxation having the authority to disqualify individuals who have acted in a manner that warrants such action under the Act. The primary policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the financial interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those managing these funds adhere to strict regulatory standards. In cases where a responsible officer of a corporate trustee contravenes the provisions of the SISA, the Commissioner can disqualify the individual, effectively barring them from managing superannuation entities in the future.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees managing superannuation entities across Australia. This federal legislation governs the conduct of individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, ensuring compliance with standards that protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA extends its reach to all responsible officers who are involved in the administration of superannuation funds, irrespective of their location within Australia. However, there are provisions within the SISA that allow for exclusions or exemptions, which may be outlined in subordinate instruments or regulations. In the case of the disqualification notice issued to Paul Ingram, the application of the SISA is direct and unequivocal, with the disqualification taking immediate effect. Any appeal against the decision or a request for reconsideration must be made within a specified period, as outlined in the Act. The notice also highlights that any person who continues to act in a prohibited capacity post-disqualification commits an offence, subject to penalties including imprisonment.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions for disqualifying individuals from holding certain roles within superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) and subsection 126A(6) allow the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person if they were a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the SISA, and the seriousness of the contraventions warrants disqualification. In this case, Paul Ingram has been disqualified because he was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities.
The Act imposes significant obligations on parties and entities it governs, particularly concerning compliance with superannuation laws and regulations. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows they are disqualified, to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or be a responsible officer of a body corporate that serves in these roles. This section underscores the importance of adherence to the Act's requirements and the severe consequences for non-compliance.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the SISA can result in serious penalties. Under section 126K, any disqualified person who continues to act in a prohibited capacity can face criminal charges and, upon conviction, up to two years in jail. This severe penalty highlights the Act's intent to maintain high standards of governance and integrity within the superannuation industry.
Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for the review and potential revocation of disqualifications. Subsection 126A(5) allows for the disqualification to be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This provision ensures that there is a pathway for individuals to seek relief if they believe their disqualification was unjust or if circumstances have changed. Furthermore, section 344 allows for the Commissioner to reconsider a decision if the affected party submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification, providing reasons why the decision should be reviewed.