Notice of Disqualification - Paul Douglas Franklin

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au C2016G00684 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

To:

Paul Douglas Franklin

TWEED HEADS SOUTH  NSW  2486

I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness, and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 18 May 2016

 

James O’Halloran

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

 

 

 

Per Colleen Shelton

 

 

 


Note 1:

In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.

Note 2:

In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.

Note 3:

In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.

 

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a regulatory framework for the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The legislation was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for oversight and regulation within the superannuation sector, ensuring that funds are managed responsibly and in the best interests of beneficiaries. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain confidence in the superannuation system by enforcing standards of conduct, governance, and financial management among superannuation entities. This Act allows for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions, as demonstrated in the notice given to Paul Douglas Franklin, thereby reinforcing the regulatory authority of the Commissioner of Taxation in upholding the integrity of the superannuation system.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry in Australia. This includes trustees, directors, and other persons involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds. The Act aims to ensure that these funds are managed in a way that protects the interests of members and their dependants. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across all states and territories in Australia, and is administered at the Commonwealth level. The Act does not explicitly state exclusions or exemptions, but it does provide for the possibility of disqualification for individuals found to have contravened its provisions. The Act can extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations, which can provide further detail on specific areas of compliance and enforcement. In the specific case of Paul Douglas Franklin, the notice of disqualification indicates that he has contravened the SISA, leading to his disqualification from involvement in the superannuation industry. This disqualification is effective immediately and will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as required by the Act.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines the primary legal framework for regulating superannuation funds in Australia. Section 126A(1) of the SISA provides the authority to disqualify individuals from managing superannuation funds if there is evidence of contraventions that are serious in nature. In this case, Paul Douglas Franklin has been disqualified under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA for contravening the Act on one or more occasions. The decision to disqualify was made based on the determination that the nature, seriousness, and number of the contraventions provided sufficient grounds for the disqualification. The disqualification imposes significant obligations on Mr. Franklin, prohibiting him from engaging in any activities related to the management of superannuation funds. This includes being a trustee, director, or employee of a superannuation fund, or otherwise participating in any capacity that would involve the administration or oversight of such funds. The disqualification is intended to prevent individuals who have demonstrated a history of non-compliance from influencing or controlling superannuation assets, thereby protecting the interests of fund members. Under the SISA, the consequences of this disqualification are severe. The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches within the notice itself. However, it is understood that contraventions of the SISA can lead to various penalties, including fines and imprisonment. The maximum penalties for offences under the SISA can vary widely depending on the specific contravention and the discretion of the court. For instance, serious or repeated breaches can result in substantial fines and lengthy periods of imprisonment. Additionally, individuals who continue to manage superannuation funds while disqualified can face further penalties, compounding their legal and financial liabilities. Further, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for Mr. Franklin to seek reconsideration of the disqualification decision. If he is dissatisfied with the decision, he must make a written request to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request should include the reasons for the reconsideration, providing an opportunity for a review of the circumstances leading to the disqualification. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application from Mr. Franklin. This flexibility allows for potential reinstatement if it can be demonstrated that the grounds for disqualification no longer exist or have been adequately addressed.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Superannuation Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.