Notice of Disqualification - Patricia Schliebs

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au C2021G00394 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

To:

 

PATRICIA SCHLIEBS

 

TINGALPA QLD 4173

 

I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.

 

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 31 May 2021

 

 

James O’Halloran

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

Per Christiane Boissezon


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

   trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

 

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the proper administration and regulation of superannuation funds in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry to prevent misconduct and financial mismanagement within superannuation entities. The Parliament of Australia enacted this legislation to provide a robust framework for the oversight of superannuation trustees, investment managers, and custodians, ensuring that they act in the best interests of fund members. The overarching policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. The Act establishes various mechanisms for supervision, enforcement, and penalties to deter and address non-compliance by industry participants.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation funds in Australia. This Act imposes various regulatory requirements on trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities to ensure compliance with the law and the protection of superannuation members' interests. The jurisdiction of the SISA is national, covering all states and territories in Australia. The Act does not exclude any particular entity or individual from its scope, except as specified by the Act itself or by subordinate instruments. Notably, the Act provides for disqualification of individuals who contravene its provisions, with the seriousness of the contravention determining whether disqualification is appropriate. The notice of disqualification is published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette and carries significant penalties, including up to two years in jail for acting in a disqualified capacity. The Act also provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification.

Key Provisions

The notice of disqualification issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Patricia Schliebs that she has been disqualified due to contraventions of the SISA. This disqualification, as per subsection 126A(1) of the SISA, takes effect immediately upon issuance. The decision to disqualify is based on the delegate's satisfaction that Patricia's contraventions are serious enough to warrant such a measure. The notice also references subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, indicating that the details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on Patricia, the disqualified person. Most notably, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that performs these roles. This restriction is critical to prevent further breaches and to ensure the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds. Non-compliance with these provisions can result in significant legal consequences. In terms of penalties, the SISA provides for substantial civil and criminal repercussions for breaches of the disqualification provisions. Specifically, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA outlines that the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. Furthermore, section 126K imposes a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment for knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity while disqualified. This underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats contraventions by disqualified individuals. For Patricia, the notice also offers a recourse mechanism under section 344 of the SISA. If she is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, she has the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must articulate the reasons for believing the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the decision, thereby providing an opportunity for Patricia to address any perceived errors or injustices.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Offence Provisions
Regulatory Standards
Repeal & Amendment

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.