NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
PATELISIO LOLOA
HEBERSHAM NSW 2770
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 September 2019
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Mark Webberley
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the operations of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the rights of superannuation fund members. This Act addresses the need for oversight and regulation in the superannuation industry to prevent mismanagement, fraud, and other unethical practices that could compromise the financial security of superannuation fund members. The SISA was enacted by the Parliament of Australia, with the policy objective of enhancing the governance and supervision of superannuation entities to maintain the integrity and sustainability of the superannuation system. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who contravene the provisions of the Act, as a means to uphold the standards and ethical requirements of the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and administration of superannuation funds in Australia. This legislation is enacted at the Commonwealth level, providing a national framework to regulate the superannuation industry. It targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers who are directly involved in the management of superannuation entities. The act aims to ensure the integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness of the superannuation system, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The act’s provisions can be extended and modified through subordinate instruments, allowing for adjustments to regulatory requirements as needed. Exclusions or exemptions within the act are limited, with strict compliance expectations for those involved in managing superannuation funds. Failure to adhere to the provisions of the SISA can result in disqualification, as evidenced in the notice provided to Patelisio Lola, who has been disqualified for contravening the act. This disqualification prohibits Lola from acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, with serious legal consequences for any non-compliance.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act. Specifically, subsection 126A(1) of the SISA allows for the disqualification of individuals who have engaged in serious contraventions of the Act. This disqualification can be imposed by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, as demonstrated in the notice provided to Patelisio Lola, who has been disqualified under subsection 126A(6). The disqualification is effective from the date the notice is issued.
The Act imposes significant obligations on individuals who have been disqualified. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian, of such an entity. This prohibition is intended to prevent disqualified individuals from continuing to manage or influence superannuation entities, which could put the interests of superannuation members at risk.
Failure to comply with the disqualification provisions can lead to serious legal consequences. As noted in Note 2, the maximum penalty for committing the offence of acting in a prohibited capacity is two years imprisonment. This penalty underscores the seriousness with which the law views breaches of the disqualification provisions. Furthermore, the notice indicates that the disqualification can be revoked either by the Commissioner’s delegate on their own initiative or in response to a written application by the disqualified person, as per subsection 126A(5).
In cases where an individual is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. Under section 344 of the Act, an affected person can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and should include the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect. This provision ensures that individuals have an opportunity to challenge the decision and seek its reversal if they believe it to be unjust.