Notice of Disqualification – Ozlem Cetinay

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au C2016G01616 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

To:

Ms Ozlem Cetinay

BOSSLEY PARK  NSW  2176

 

I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

Dated: 2 December 2016

 

James O’Halloran

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

 

Per Leanne Mclean


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry. This legislation was introduced to ensure the integrity and proper administration of superannuation entities, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act provides a framework for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, aiming to maintain public confidence in the superannuation system. The Act was enacted to fill a significant gap in the regulation of the superannuation industry, which was previously overseen by multiple state and territory authorities, leading to inconsistencies and inefficiencies in regulation. By establishing a federal framework, the SISA aimed to streamline supervision and ensure a uniform standard of conduct and compliance across the industry.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals who are involved in the administration, management, or operation of superannuation entities, such as trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation funds. The act encompasses a broad range of entities and individuals within the superannuation industry, ensuring that those who manage or influence the financial welfare of superannuation fund members adhere to strict regulatory standards. This includes both individual natural persons and body corporates that act in the aforementioned capacities. The jurisdictional reach of the SISA is national, operating under the Commonwealth of Australia to oversee and regulate the superannuation industry across all states and territories. The act explicitly prohibits disqualified individuals from performing roles such as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or from acting as responsible officers for such entities, as outlined in section 126K. Any contravention of these provisions can lead to disqualification, as seen in the notice to Ms Ozlem Cetinay. The act allows for the disqualification to be revoked under specific circumstances, either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person, as noted in subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. Furthermore, individuals dissatisfied with a disqualification decision can seek reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, as per section 344 of the SISA.

Key Provisions

The notice issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Ms Ozlem Cetinay that she has been disqualified from participating in the superannuation industry. This disqualification arises from a determination that Ms Cetinay has contravened the SISA on multiple occasions, with the seriousness of these contraventions justifying her disqualification. The disqualification becomes effective on the date of the notice, as stated in the document. The SISA imposes specific obligations on entities and individuals within the superannuation industry. For instance, section 126K of the Act prohibits a disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or being a responsible officer or a body corporate in such a role. Any person who knowingly violates this provision commits an offence under the Act. The seriousness of this offence is underscored by the potential penalty, which can include up to two years imprisonment, as outlined in the notice. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the relevant authority or in response to a written application from the disqualified individual. This flexibility provides a pathway for Ms Cetinay to potentially have her disqualification lifted if she can demonstrate grounds for revocation. If Ms Cetinay is dissatisfied with the decision to disqualify her, section 344 of the SISA allows her to request a reconsideration of the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification and should include the reasons she believes the decision to be incorrect. This provision ensures that affected parties have a formal mechanism to seek review of the decision.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Offence Provisions
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Catchwords
Disqualification
Contravention

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.