NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – OMAR SHAHID
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
OMAR SHAHID
KEARNS NSW 2558
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 September 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per RAVI NARAYANAN
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation entities, with the primary objective of ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians act in the best interests of their members. The SISA aims to protect the retirement savings of Australians by enforcing compliance with the law and ensuring that those in positions of responsibility within the superannuation industry are fit and proper persons. The Act was introduced to address gaps in the regulation of the superannuation industry, particularly in relation to the management and oversight of superannuation funds. The SISA is administered by the Australian Taxation Office, with the Commissioner of Taxation having the authority to disqualify individuals from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry if they are deemed unsuitable. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system and to protect the interests of superannuation members by ensuring that those managing their funds are accountable and compliant with legislative requirements.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities, encompassing a wide range of individuals and entities within the superannuation industry. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of the Act extends throughout Australia, operating under a Commonwealth framework but also intersecting with state and territory regulations. The Act's application is triggered when a responsible officer of a corporate trustee is involved in contraventions of the Act, leading to potential disqualification. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act's application are narrowly defined, focusing on the specific conduct and roles within superannuation entities. The Act also allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, which can further define the scope and specifics of compliance and enforcement actions.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification provided to Omar Shahid by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, indicates that Omar has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA). This disqualification is due to Omar’s role as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities that have contravened the SISA on multiple occasions. The seriousness of these contraventions has provided grounds for Omar’s disqualification. The notice, as required by subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, informs Omar that the disqualification takes immediate effect from the date of the notice, which is 12 September 2023.
The obligations imposed on Omar under this disqualification are significant. As per section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for Omar, who is now aware of his disqualified status, to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of any superannuation entity. Additionally, he is prohibited from being or acting as a responsible officer of a body corporate that serves in any of these roles within the superannuation industry. The potential consequences for breaching this prohibition are severe, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment, as stipulated by the same section. This legal framework aims to ensure that individuals who have been found to have acted irresponsibly within the superannuation industry do not continue to hold positions of trust and responsibility within it.
Further, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or by Omar if he submits a written application. This provides Omar with a pathway to potentially regain his eligibility to serve in relevant capacities within the superannuation industry, provided he meets any conditions set by the Commissioner. Additionally, under section 344 of the SISA, Omar has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the disqualification decision if he believes it is unjust. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should outline the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision. This reconsideration process is an essential safeguard, ensuring that Omar has an opportunity to challenge the decision if he believes it to be erroneous or unfair.