NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Nigel Fotualii
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Nigel Fotualii
ESCHOL PARK NSW 2558
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 February 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the operations of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that it adheres to high standards of accountability, transparency, and efficiency. This legislation was introduced to address the need for comprehensive oversight and regulation of superannuation funds, trustees, and other related entities to protect the interests of superannuation members and beneficiaries. The Act is administered by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), which are tasked with enforcing the provisions of the SISA and ensuring compliance with its requirements. The overarching policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation members by promoting responsible management and administration of superannuation funds. The legislation provides a framework for the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry, with a focus on preventing misconduct, ensuring proper investment practices, and maintaining the integrity of the system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, the Act applies to trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as responsible officers or body corporates that act in these capacities. The Act’s jurisdiction extends nationally across Australia, enforcing compliance with superannuation regulations uniformly. The disqualification provisions outlined in the Act are designed to maintain the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation industry by barring individuals who have breached the Act from performing certain roles within it. The geographic reach of this legislation is nationwide, impacting all Australian jurisdictions equally. Exclusions or exemptions are not detailed within the provided excerpt, however, it is common for such acts to contain specific criteria that determine applicability. Additionally, the Act allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, ensuring flexibility in enforcement and adaptation to evolving industry practices.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification provided under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Nigel Fotualii that he has been disqualified from engaging in certain activities related to superannuation entities. This disqualification is due to his contravention of the SISA, which has been deemed serious enough to warrant such action. The disqualification becomes effective immediately upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the document. The notice specifies that the disqualification is in line with subsection 126A(1) of the SISA, where the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, in this case Emma Rosenzweig, has determined that the seriousness of the contraventions justifies the disqualification.
The SISA imposes various obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Specifically, section 126K of the SISA mandates that a disqualified person must not act as, or be, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or a responsible officer or a body corporate that falls under these categories. This is a critical obligation aimed at maintaining the integrity and proper management of superannuation entities. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in serious legal consequences.
The Act also outlines the penalties and consequences for breaches. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to contravene the provisions by acting in the specified roles within a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment, as highlighted in the notice. This stringent penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its provisions. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the relevant authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
For those affected by the decision and dissatisfied with it, the SISA provides a recourse mechanism. Section 344 of the Act allows for a reconsideration request to be made to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification. This request must be in writing and should detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This provision ensures that there is an opportunity for review and potential rectification of any perceived errors in the disqualification process.