NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – NICOLE ROYAL
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Nicole Royal
HARRISON ACT 2914
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 28 October 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Ravi Narayanan
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia and ensure the protection of superannuation funds. This legislation was introduced to address the need for oversight and regulation in the superannuation sector, aiming to prevent misconduct and ensure the proper management of superannuation entities. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and its policy objective is to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation system by imposing obligations on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act. This disqualification serves as a deterrent against misconduct and ensures that responsible officers maintain high standards of conduct in managing superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. This Commonwealth legislation ensures the proper functioning of the superannuation industry and protects the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act's scope extends to all trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, regardless of where they are located within Australia. The disqualification provisions, as evidenced by the disqualification of Nicole Royal, are particularly pertinent to those who have breached the Act's requirements while serving in a responsible capacity. The Act may also extend its application through subordinate instruments, although specific details are not provided in this instance. There are no explicit exclusions or exemptions mentioned in the text, but the Act allows for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions, and aggrieved parties have the right to seek reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains several critical provisions, notably under sections 126A and 126K, that pertain to the disqualification of individuals from certain roles within superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(6), a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can issue a notice of disqualification to an individual like Nicole Royal, who is deemed to have been a responsible officer at the time when the corporate trustee of a superannuation entity contravened the Act. This disqualification arises if the contraventions are of a nature that justifies such action. The disqualification, as seen in this notice, becomes effective immediately upon issuance.
The SISA imposes specific obligations on parties governed by it, including responsible officers of corporate trustees. These officers must ensure compliance with the Act to avoid personal disqualification. If a corporate trustee breaches the SISA, any responsible officer at the time of such contraventions may be disqualified. Additionally, section 126K of the SISA mandates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such a body corporate. This stringent requirement underscores the critical importance of adherence to the Act's provisions.
In terms of consequences, the SISA provides for both criminal and civil penalties. Under section 126K, the maximum penalty for knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity while disqualified is two years imprisonment. This reflects the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches and the importance of maintaining high standards of governance within the superannuation industry. Moreover, the Act allows for the revocation of a disqualification notice under certain conditions, such as upon the written application of the disqualified person or on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation, as per subsection 126A(5). Finally, aggrieved parties have recourse to seek reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344. This provision ensures that individuals have a formal avenue to challenge decisions that they believe are unjust.