NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Nicole Mouzakis - 19 July 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Nicole Mouzakis
Mill Park VIC 3082
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 19 July 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Debbi Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of superannuation entities to ensure the protection of fund members’ interests. The SISA was introduced by the Australian Parliament to establish a robust regulatory framework that governs the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians within the superannuation industry. This legislative initiative was driven by the policy objective to maintain the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of individuals relying on superannuation funds for their retirement. The Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals found to have engaged in serious contraventions of the legislation, ensuring accountability and compliance within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers within corporate trustees of superannuation entities, which include individuals and entities involved in managing superannuation funds. The act has a national reach across Australia, covering all states and territories, and is enforced by the Commissioner of Taxation. The disqualification notice issued under this act, as exemplified by the case of Nicole Mouzakis, serves to prevent individuals who have been part of corporate trustees that have contravened the SISA from acting in roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of superannuation entities. This disqualification is significant as it is intended to maintain the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds. The notice also includes provisions for the disqualification to be published in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness. Additionally, the act provides for the potential revocation of disqualification and outlines the process for reconsideration by the Commissioner if the affected party is unsatisfied with the decision. The seriousness of the contraventions is a critical factor in determining the applicability of the disqualification, which can lead to severe penalties, including imprisonment.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6), which allow for the disqualification of individuals who are responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the SISA. Section 126A(2) provides the grounds for disqualification, while subsection 126A(6) requires the Commissioner to give notice of the disqualification to the affected individual. Additionally, section 126K sets out the offence and penalty for a disqualified person acting in certain roles within a superannuation entity.
Under the SISA, the obligations imposed on the parties or entities it governs include adherence to the statutory requirements governing superannuation entities, particularly those concerning the roles of responsible officers and corporate trustees. The Act mandates that responsible officers ensure that the corporate trustees comply with the SISA, and failure to do so can lead to disqualification. Moreover, corporate trustees must operate within the legal framework set by the SISA, and any contraventions can have significant repercussions for the responsible officers involved.
The SISA also outlines serious consequences for breaches of its provisions. Section 126K specifies that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such a role. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance. Additionally, the disqualification notice itself, as provided under section 126A(7), will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the disqualification.
For those affected by the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. If an individual is dissatisfied with the decision, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider it in writing within 21 days of receiving notice. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the decision, offering a degree of procedural fairness. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual, providing a potential pathway for reinstatement.