NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Nick Voukelatos
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Nick Voukelatos
QUAKERS HILL NSW 2763
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 9 March 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry. The Act was designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the proper management and administration of superannuation entities. It aimed to fill the gap in the regulation of superannuation funds, which were increasingly important as a source of retirement income for Australians. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by imposing obligations on trustees, investment managers, and custodians, and by providing mechanisms for the supervision and enforcement of these obligations. This includes the power to disqualify individuals who are responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the Act, as illustrated in the case of Nick Voukelatos, who was disqualified by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation under the provisions of the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees within the superannuation industry, imposing obligations and prohibitions on their conduct to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation operates on a Commonwealth level, with its reach extending across Australia, thereby affecting entities and individuals within the superannuation sector nationwide. The Act disqualifies individuals from acting as responsible officers if they have been involved in the contravention of SISA provisions, with the disqualification taking immediate effect upon issuance. The Act also provides for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification under certain conditions, and it includes provisions for judicial review of the disqualification decision. The Act’s application is not absolute, as it may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, allowing for flexibility in enforcement and adaptation to new circumstances. The seriousness of the contraventions and the role of the individual at the time of the contraventions are key factors in determining the applicability and extent of the disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who have been responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the Act. Section 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of such individuals, and section 126A(6) mandates the issuing of a notice of disqualification. In this instance, Nick Voukelatos has been disqualified under section 126A(2) because the corporate trustee for one or more superannuation entities has breached the SISA, and Nick was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. The seriousness of these contraventions provided sufficient grounds for the disqualification, which took effect immediately upon issuance of the notice.
Under the SISA, the disqualification imposes significant obligations on Nick Voukelatos. As a disqualified person, he is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or serving as a responsible officer for any body corporate that holds these roles. This restriction is designed to prevent individuals with a history of non-compliance from influencing or managing superannuation funds. Additionally, Nick must ensure that he does not engage in any activities that would allow him to indirectly control or influence the management of superannuation funds.
Failing to adhere to the disqualification can lead to serious legal consequences. Section 126K of the SISA criminalises the act of a disqualified person knowingly being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years in jail, highlighting the seriousness with which the legislation treats breaches of these provisions. This legal framework aims to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry by preventing disqualified individuals from returning to roles where they could potentially cause further harm.
Additionally, there are provisions for potential revocation of the disqualification. Subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the disqualification to be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Nick Voukelatos. If Nick believes the disqualification was unjust or seeks to re-enter the industry, he can apply for revocation. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for Nick to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if he is dissatisfied with it. This reconsideration request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should detail the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect.