NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - NICHOLAS PLOWMAN
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
NICHOLAS PLOWMAN
MONA VALE NSW 2103
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 3 October 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pamela Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation entities, with the aim of protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation within the superannuation industry to prevent mismanagement and fraudulent activities. The SISA is administered by the Australian Parliament, with the objective of ensuring that superannuation funds are managed responsibly and in the best interests of their members. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who have been responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the Act, as seen in the case of Nicholas Plowman, who has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA due to the seriousness of the contraventions committed by the corporate trustee of which he was a responsible officer. The disqualification serves as a deterrent and ensures that individuals who fail to uphold the standards set by the Act are held accountable.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees who oversee superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with the regulatory framework governing the industry. Specifically, the Act targets individuals such as Nicholas Plowman, who, by virtue of their role, are held accountable for breaches of the Act by the entities they represent. The jurisdiction of this Act is Commonwealth-wide, reflecting its national scope and the critical nature of superannuation regulation across Australia. Exclusions or exemptions are not explicitly detailed within the notice, but the Act provides pathways for revocation of disqualifications and reconsideration of decisions by affected parties. The Act’s application extends through subordinate instruments, which may further delineate specific conditions and procedural requirements for enforcement and review.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides the legislative framework for the regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. Section 126A(6) of the SISA mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must provide a disqualified person with a notice of disqualification. In this case, Nicholas Plowman has been formally notified under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, that he has been disqualified from acting in a responsible capacity within the superannuation industry. The disqualification arises from the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities breaching the SISA, with Nicholas Plowman having been a responsible officer at the time of these contraventions. The severity of the breaches has led to the decision to disqualify him.
The SISA imposes specific obligations on parties and entities within the superannuation industry. For instance, responsible officers of corporate trustees must adhere to the standards and requirements set out in the SISA to ensure the proper management and supervision of superannuation entities. Failure to comply with these standards can result in serious consequences, including personal disqualification, as seen in this case. The Act requires trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers to act with integrity and in the best interests of superannuation fund members.
Breaching the terms of the disqualification constitutes a serious offence under the SISA. According to section 126K, any disqualified person who knowingly acts as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity commits an offence. This carries a significant penalty, with the maximum punishment being two years imprisonment. Additionally, the disqualification notice, as required by subsection 126A(7), will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the disqualification.
The SISA also provides mechanisms for potential revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, for those who are dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, section 344 allows for a request for reconsideration to be made to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be in writing and must outline the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect.