NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Nicholas Fahey
Christmas Hills VIC 3775
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 10 June 2021
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues of governance and compliance within the superannuation industry, aiming to ensure that superannuation entities are managed responsibly and in the best interests of their members. The Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to establish a regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation funds, including provisions for the disqualification of individuals found to be unfit to manage these funds. The SISA seeks to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by imposing strict regulatory standards on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The policy objective of the Act is to protect the superannuation savings of Australians by ensuring that the industry is overseen by capable and trustworthy individuals and entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and corporate entities involved in the administration of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act covers all aspects of superannuation management within Australia, establishing standards and regulatory requirements to ensure the proper management and protection of superannuation funds. The jurisdiction of this legislation extends nationally, as it is a Commonwealth Act, thereby encompassing all states and territories in Australia. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals who have been responsible officers of corporate trustees and have been involved in serious contraventions of the SISA. Exclusions and exemptions from the Act's provisions are generally limited, with the primary exceptions being those who can demonstrate they were not involved in the contraventions or where the contraventions were not of a serious nature. The Act also allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, enabling the regulations to adapt to changes in industry practices and standards over time.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains key provisions that govern the conduct and disqualification of individuals in the superannuation industry. Under subsection 126A(6) of the Act, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify a responsible officer of a corporate trustee if there has been a contravention of the Act by the corporate trustee, and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies the disqualification (subsection 126A(2)). This means that if an individual, in this case Nicholas Fahey, was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions and those contraventions were serious enough, they can be disqualified from participating in superannuation entities in certain roles.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the disqualified person. Firstly, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that performs these roles. This prohibition is designed to prevent individuals who have been found to have breached the Act from continuing to manage or influence superannuation entities. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is a two-year jail term, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act regards such breaches.
Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for the potential revocation of a disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This allows for the possibility of reinstatement if the disqualified individual can demonstrate that the circumstances leading to their disqualification have been rectified or if they can provide sufficient grounds for reconsideration.
Finally, the Act ensures that there are avenues for appeal or reconsideration of the disqualification decision. Under section 344 of the SISA, if Nicholas Fahey or any other affected party is dissatisfied with the decision, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and should include the reasons why the decision is considered wrong. This provision ensures that there is a formal process in place for addressing grievances and potentially reversing unjust or erroneous disqualifications.