NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Ngaire Davis
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ngaire Davis
Dubbo NSW 2830
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contravention you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 20 October 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to provide for the regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring the proper administration and investment of superannuation funds. The Act was introduced to address issues of mismanagement and misconduct within the superannuation sector, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the administration and investment of superannuation funds, aiming to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring proper management practices. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain high standards of conduct and compliance within the superannuation industry, thereby protecting members' retirement savings. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from managing superannuation funds if they are found to have contravened the Act, as evidenced by the disqualification of Ngaire Davis for her role in the corporate trustee's contraventions.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds within Australia, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act's jurisdiction extends to the entire Commonwealth, ensuring a national regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation entities. The disqualification provisions outlined in the Act apply to responsible officers of corporate trustees who have been involved in serious contraventions of the Act. The disqualification can be imposed by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation and is effective from the date of issuance, barring the disqualified person from acting in certain roles within superannuation entities. Additionally, the Act includes provisions for the potential revocation of disqualifications and the ability for affected parties to request a reconsideration of the decision within a specified timeframe. It is also noted that any disqualified person who knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity post-disqualification commits an offence that carries a significant penalty, including up to two years of imprisonment.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have been associated with corporate trustees that have contravened the Act. Section 126A(2) of the SISA empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a responsible officer of a corporate trustee if they find that the corporate trustee has contravened the Act and the seriousness of the contravention warrants such action. In this case, Ngaire Davis has been disqualified under this provision due to her role as a responsible officer at the time of the contravention.
The Act imposes clear obligations on parties and entities it governs, particularly those in responsible positions within corporate trustees. These individuals must ensure compliance with the SISA to avoid personal disqualification. Section 126K of the SISA further outlines that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that performs such roles. The seriousness of such an offence is underscored by the potential penalty of up to two years of imprisonment.
In the event of a breach of the SISA, the consequences can be severe. The Act provides for both civil and criminal penalties. Under section 126K, any disqualified person who knowingly acts in a restricted capacity can face criminal charges, with a maximum penalty of two years in jail. This stringent penalty reflects the importance of adherence to the Act's provisions, particularly for those in responsible positions. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of a disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon the written application of the disqualified person.
For those affected by such disqualification, the Act provides a recourse mechanism. Section 344 allows an individual to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration request must be in writing and detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This provision ensures that individuals have a fair opportunity to challenge decisions that they believe are unjust or erroneous.