NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Newmaker Evah Nhanga
WOONONA NSW 2517
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 3 May 2017
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Colleen Shelton
Director, Superannuation Engagement and Assurance
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the superannuation industry and ensure compliance with the law, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The legislation was introduced to address issues and gaps in the supervision and management of superannuation entities, particularly focusing on the responsibilities and conduct of trustees and responsible officers. The SISA aims to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by enforcing standards and penalties for non-compliance. As a part of this legislative framework, the Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they are found to have engaged in serious or repeated breaches of the Act. This ensures that those who fail to uphold the required standards are prevented from continuing to influence or control superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, particularly those acting as trustees, investment managers, custodians, or responsible officers of superannuation entities. This Act has a Commonwealth jurisdiction, thereby affecting entities and individuals across Australia. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying responsible officers from participating in the superannuation industry if they are associated with a corporate trustee that has repeatedly or seriously contravened the SISA. The disqualification becomes effective on the date of issuance, and details of such disqualifications are published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. It is noted that any disqualified person who knowingly engages in prohibited activities faces criminal penalties, including up to two years in jail. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualifications either by the authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. Furthermore, dissatisfied parties have the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides mechanisms for disqualifying individuals from certain roles within superannuation entities, particularly when they have been responsible officers of corporate trustees that have breached the Act. Section 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of an individual if they were a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the SISA, and the nature of these contraventions warrants such action. This disqualification takes immediate effect upon notice being issued under subsection 126A(6), as exemplified in the notice sent to Evah Nhanga. This notice informs her that she has been disqualified due to her role in the corporate trustee's contraventions of the SISA.
Under the Act, individuals disqualified under section 126A are barred from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or as responsible officers for entities fulfilling these roles. This is explicitly stated under section 126K, which stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to be, or act as, any of these roles if they are aware of their disqualification. The severity of this offence is underscored by the potential penalty of up to two years in jail.
Additionally, the Act allows for the possibility of disqualification revocation. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the relevant authorities or through a written application by the disqualified individual. This provides a pathway for individuals to potentially have their disqualification overturned if they can demonstrate a change in circumstances or rectify the issues that led to their initial disqualification.
For those affected by the disqualification decision, section 344 offers a mechanism for reconsideration. This provision requires that any request for reconsideration be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification. The request must articulate the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect, thereby allowing the Commissioner to review the case and potentially alter the decision. This ensures that the process remains fair and provides an opportunity for rectifying any perceived injustices.