NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – NEIL URGE
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
NEIL URGE
WHALAN NSW 2770
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 July 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nichola Wood-Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation benefits for members. The Act was passed by the Australian Parliament and is administered by the Commissioner of Taxation. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain and improve the standard of administration, investment, and performance of superannuation funds, and to protect the interests of fund members. In this instance, the Act was invoked to disqualify Neil Urge from acting as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee due to repeated breaches of the Act by the trustee entity. This disqualification aims to uphold the integrity and compliance of superannuation fund management, ensuring that trustees act in the best interests of their members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and corporate entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities. Specifically, it pertains to responsible officers of corporate trustees who have contravened the provisions of the Act. This notice of disqualification affects Neil Urge, a person who, at the time of the contraventions, was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities. The disqualification arises from multiple contraventions of the SISA that provide sufficient grounds for such action. The jurisdiction of this Act is Commonwealth, extending its reach across the entire nation, ensuring a uniform regulatory framework for superannuation trustees, investment managers, and custodians. However, the Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions regarding the entities or conduct it regulates, indicating a broad application across various industries dealing with superannuation. The Act also provides for the revocation of disqualification under certain conditions and outlines penalties for those who continue to act in a prohibited capacity post-disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines various provisions for the regulation and supervision of superannuation entities in Australia. Section 126A(2) of the SISA empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from acting as a responsible officer if they are satisfied that a corporate trustee has contravened the SISA on multiple occasions, and the person was a responsible officer at the time of those contraventions. This disqualification takes effect immediately upon its issuance, as stated in subsection 126A(6).
The disqualification imposes significant obligations on the affected individual, Neil Urge, prohibiting them from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of any superannuation entity, or being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee. This is explicitly stated in section 126K of the SISA. The consequences of breaching these provisions are severe, with the potential for criminal liability. Specifically, if a disqualified person knowingly engages in any of the prohibited activities, they commit an offence that carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment.
Furthermore, section 126A(5) of the SISA provides that the disqualification may be revoked either by the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This flexibility allows for potential reinstatement under certain conditions. For those who believe their disqualification is unjust, section 344 of the SISA offers a recourse mechanism. Affected individuals can request the Commissioner to reconsider their disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should detail the reasons why the individual believes the decision is incorrect.
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of the disqualification notice are to be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public accountability. This publication serves as a formal notification to the public and relevant stakeholders about the disqualification, reinforcing the regulatory framework's integrity.