Notice of Disqualification – Neil Bartlett – 27 August 2025

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2025N00698 In force Notifiable Instrument

Legislation content

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – NEIL BARTLETT – 27 August 2025

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

NEIL BARTLETT

 

FALCON  WA  6210

 

I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.

 

I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 27 August 2025

 

 

Emma Rosenzweig

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

Per Karen A Taylor


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to establish a regulatory framework that ensures the proper management and supervision of superannuation entities in Australia. The Act was introduced to address the need for a robust regulatory environment to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by overseeing the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Commonwealth Parliament enacted this legislation to provide a comprehensive legal structure that promotes transparency, accountability, and compliance within the superannuation industry. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the financial interests and retirement security of superannuation fund members by ensuring that entities managing these funds adhere to high standards of governance and conduct. This legislation allows the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened the provisions of the Act, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification issued to Neil Bartlett on 27 August 2025. The notice, issued under the authority of the Act, signifies that Bartlett has been disqualified due to multiple contraventions of the Act's requirements, justifying such a measure. The disqualification is intended to prevent Bartlett from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry, thereby protecting the interests of fund members. The notice also informs Bartlett of the right to seek reconsideration of the decision within 21 days and the potential for the disqualification to be revoked under certain conditions.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds within Australia. This includes trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act has a Commonwealth jurisdictional reach, impacting the entire nation, and its provisions are designed to regulate and oversee the superannuation industry to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The notice of disqualification under the Act extends to individuals like Neil Bartlett who have contravened the provisions of the SISA, providing grounds for their disqualification. Notably, the Act also includes mechanisms for the revocation of disqualifications and provides avenues for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is unsatisfied with the outcome. The Act’s reach is further extended through its subordinate instruments, which detail specific penalties and procedural aspects of enforcement.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions that permit the disqualification of individuals from participating in superannuation activities. Section 126A(1) of the SISA allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act, and the number of contraventions provides grounds for such disqualification. This process is initiated by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, as seen in the notice issued to Neil Bartlett, where it is stated that he has been disqualified under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon the issuance of the notice, as mentioned in the notice dated 27 August 2025. Under the SISA, disqualified individuals face significant obligations and restrictions. Section 126K of the Act specifies that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such roles for a superannuation entity. This is to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and ensure that only those deemed fit can manage their superannuation interests. The penalties for contravening these provisions are severe, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment for each offence, emphasising the seriousness of the disqualification. The consequences of breaching the provisions of the SISA extend beyond criminal penalties. The disqualification notice, as outlined in subsection 126A(7), will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. This public notification serves to warn other entities and the public about the disqualification, thereby preventing the disqualified individual from continuing to engage in activities that could harm superannuation fund members. Moreover, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This provides a pathway for individuals to potentially have their disqualification lifted if they can demonstrate that the grounds for disqualification no longer exist. For individuals affected by a disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA offers a mechanism for reconsideration. If a person is not satisfied with the disqualification decision, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider it in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must include the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect, providing an opportunity for the individual to challenge the decision and potentially have it overturned or modified. This process ensures that the disqualification decision is fair and that individuals have a chance to address any perceived errors or injustices in the decision-making process.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Financial Regulation
Superannuation Law
Instrument
Notifiable Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations
Administrative Discretion

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.