NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Narelle Joy Stapleton
OCEAN GROVE VIC 3226
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 15 December 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Colleen Shelton
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the supervision and administration of superannuation funds in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and other responsible persons adhere to strict standards of conduct and accountability. The Act was introduced to address the need for a robust regulatory framework to oversee the administration of superannuation funds, given their significant role in the financial well-being of Australians. The SISA is administered by the Australian Parliament, and one of its key policy objectives is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by disqualifying individuals who fail to meet the required standards. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying persons who have contravened its requirements, with the aim of preventing those who have demonstrated unsuitability from participating in the management of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities within Australia. Specifically, it imposes obligations and provides regulatory powers to the Commissioner of Taxation to ensure compliance with the standards and practices expected in the superannuation industry. The Act applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, as well as to corporate trustees. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who contravene its provisions, with the disqualification barring them from acting in specified roles within the superannuation industry. This disqualification is a serious measure, as it is published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette and carries potential criminal penalties for continued involvement in prohibited activities. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions and provides avenues for reconsideration of decisions by affected parties.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation entities. In the case of Mrs Narelle Joy Stapleton, she has been disqualified by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, James O'Halloran, under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA. This disqualification notice, pursuant to subsection 126A(6), informs Mrs Stapleton that she is disqualified because she has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provide sufficient grounds for disqualification. The disqualification is effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice.
The SISA imposes obligations on individuals who have been disqualified to refrain from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry. Specifically, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification to serve as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that assumes such roles. The seriousness of these obligations is underscored by the potential penalties for non-compliance, which include a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. These provisions ensure that individuals who have been found to have breached the SISA do not continue to manage or influence superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members.
Additionally, the SISA provides for the potential revocation of disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified individual. This offers a pathway for individuals who believe they have rectified the issues that led to their disqualification to potentially regain their eligibility to participate in the superannuation industry. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA allows for the reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the decision. Any such reconsideration request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the disqualification notice and must detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This process ensures that there is a mechanism for review and potential rectification of the disqualification decision, providing a measure of fairness to the individuals affected.