NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – NAOMI MPOFU - 24 January 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
NAOMI MPOFU
TWO ROCKS WA 6037
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature, number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 24 January 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bharti Ben
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed efficiently, economically, and in the best interests of the members. The Act was introduced to address the problem of ensuring adequate supervision and regulation of superannuation funds to protect members' interests and maintain confidence in the superannuation system. This legislation allows for the disqualification of individuals from holding responsible positions within superannuation entities if there are serious breaches of the Act. The policy objective is to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry by preventing individuals involved in significant contraventions from continuing to manage superannuation entities. This ensures that superannuation funds are managed in accordance with the law and in the best interests of the members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities, particularly targeting responsible officers and trustees of corporate trustees. The Act extends its jurisdictional reach across the Commonwealth of Australia, thereby impacting all states and territories uniformly. The Act explicitly targets individuals who have acted as responsible officers during instances where the corporate trustee of a superannuation entity has contravened the Act. The disqualification process, as outlined in the Act, mandates that a notice is given to the affected individual, such as Naomi Mpofu, when they are deemed to have grounds for disqualification due to the nature, number, and seriousness of the contraventions. The consequences of such disqualification include a prohibition from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with the potential for criminal penalties if violated. Additionally, the Act provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of disqualification through the Commissioner.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification provided to Naomi Mpofu under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs her that she has been disqualified from being involved with superannuation entities. The disqualification arises because Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, is satisfied that Naomi, as a responsible officer of the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities, was involved in contraventions of the SISA. The nature, number, and seriousness of these contraventions warrant the disqualification, which takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice. This process is outlined in subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties involved with superannuation entities, including responsible officers and trustees. These individuals must adhere to the provisions of the SISA to ensure compliance with regulatory standards. Failure to comply can result in significant repercussions, as evidenced by Naomi's disqualification. Furthermore, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that serves in these roles. This prohibition is intended to maintain the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation industry.
Failure to comply with the disqualification provisions can result in severe consequences. Section 126K of the SISA stipulates that knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity while disqualified is an offence. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years in jail, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of these provisions. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either by the authority's own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This flexibility allows for reconsideration and potential reinstatement under appropriate circumstances. Moreover, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for Naomi to request a reconsideration of the decision if she is dissatisfied with it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice and should detail the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect.