NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Murugan Rajangam
PORT HEDLAND WA 6721
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 10 July 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to address significant concerns regarding the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the industry's integrity, efficiency, and compliance with regulatory standards. The SIS Act was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, reflecting the national scope and importance of the superannuation system in Australia. The policy objective of the Act is to promote confidence in the superannuation industry, safeguard the financial interests of members, and maintain the overall stability of the superannuation system. The Act provides a comprehensive framework for the regulation of superannuation entities, trustees, and related service providers, empowering the Commissioner of Taxation to take enforcement actions, including disqualification orders, against individuals who breach the Act's provisions.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds within Australia, including trustees, investment managers and custodians. The Act covers the conduct and transactions of these persons and entities, with a specific focus on ensuring compliance with the regulatory framework designed to protect superannuation savings. The geographical scope of the Act is national, as it applies across all states and territories of Australia. The Act's reach extends to any person or entity involved in the supervision or management of superannuation funds, regardless of their location within the country. While the Act broadly applies to all relevant parties, there may be certain exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds defined within the legislation or through subordinate instruments that could affect specific situations or entities. The Act provides for disqualification orders, such as the one issued to Mr. Murugan Rajangam, which can be implemented when there is evidence of contraventions of the Act that warrant such a measure. This disqualification order is effective immediately upon issuance and is subject to potential revocation under certain conditions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) includes provisions that allow the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from holding positions such as trustees or responsible officers within entities that manage superannuation funds. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SIS Act, a delegate of the Commissioner, such as Ivan Parrett in the provided notice, can disqualify an individual if they have contravened the SIS Act in a manner that warrants such action. The notice specifies that Mr Murugan Rajangam has been disqualified from these roles due to contraventions of the SIS Act.
The Act imposes several obligations on the individuals and entities it governs. Trustees and responsible officers must adhere to the regulatory requirements set forth in the SIS Act to ensure the proper management and oversight of superannuation funds. This includes maintaining compliance with the Act's standards, which cover areas such as the proper administration of superannuation accounts, the disclosure of information, and the safeguarding of fund assets. Any breach of these obligations can lead to the enforcement of disqualification orders.
The SIS Act also stipulates various penalties and consequences for non-compliance. For example, subsection 126A(1) of the Act allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act, as seen in the notice to Mr Rajangam. Additionally, section 344 of the Act provides a mechanism for affected individuals to request a reconsideration of a disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving notice. Failure to comply with the Act's requirements can result in serious civil or criminal penalties, although the specific penalties are not detailed in the provided notice.
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, the details of a disqualification order are to be published in the Gazette, ensuring transparency and public awareness of such actions. Furthermore, the Act allows for the revocation of a disqualification order either at the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual, as stated in subsection 126A(5). This provides a potential avenue for individuals like Mr Rajangam to seek reinstatement of their positions if they can demonstrate compliance with the Act's requirements or if the initial disqualification was unjust.