NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ms Vicky Tinatin
GREEN VALLEY NSW 2168
I, Ivan Parrett a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, investment manager, custodian or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SIS Act.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 9 January 2014.
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bernard Morrison
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to provide comprehensive regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing issues of governance, compliance, and consumer protection within superannuation funds. This Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament with a policy objective to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those who manage these funds are fit and proper persons. A significant gap the Act aimed to fill was the need for stringent oversight and accountability in the management of superannuation entities, to prevent mismanagement, fraud, and other malpractices that could detrimentally affect fund members. The disqualification notice issued under this Act, as seen in the example, reflects the legislation's intent to maintain high standards of integrity and competence among trustees and responsible officers in the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, specifically targeting those who act as trustees, investment managers, custodians, or responsible officers of superannuation entities. This Act has a national reach, operating under the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth to ensure the proper administration and regulation of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act’s provisions are designed to maintain high standards of conduct and compliance within the industry, safeguarding the interests of superannuation beneficiaries. The notice of disqualification provided to Ms Vicky Tinatin highlights the Act's application to individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds due to their conduct or character. The Act's scope extends to disqualifying individuals from performing critical roles within superannuation entities, thereby protecting the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system. The disqualification order, as in this case, is enforceable immediately upon issuance and is subject to potential revocation or review under specific provisions of the Act.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) includes a provision that allows for the disqualification of individuals from being a trustee, investment manager, custodian or a responsible officer of a body corporate that administers a superannuation entity (subsection 126A(6)). In this case, Ms Vicky Tinatin has been notified by Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, that she has been disqualified under subsection 126A(3) of the SIS Act, due to a determination that she is not a fit and proper person to hold such a position. This disqualification order is effective from the date of the notice, which is 9 January 2014.
The SIS Act imposes specific obligations on trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. These roles are entrusted with the management and protection of superannuation funds, and thus, the Act requires that only fit and proper persons occupy these positions. By disqualifying Ms Tinatin, the delegate has determined that she does not meet these standards and is therefore unfit to continue in her role. This disqualification is intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and ensure the integrity of the superannuation system.
Ms Tinatin, as a disqualified individual, is now subject to certain legal consequences if she attempts to continue in her role. Any person who contravenes a disqualification order by acting in a capacity that they have been disqualified from may be subject to penalties under the SIS Act. The specific penalties are not detailed in the notice provided but can include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The Act also provides mechanisms for the revocation of disqualification orders and the reconsideration of decisions, offering avenues for appeal and rectification for those who believe they have been wrongly disqualified.
In accordance with the SIS Act, particulars of the disqualification will be published in the Gazette (subsection 126A(7)), ensuring transparency and public notification of such decisions. Additionally, Ms Tinatin has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice (section 344), provided she submits a written application outlining the reasons for her request. This process allows for the possibility of the disqualification being reviewed and potentially revoked if new evidence or circumstances come to light.