NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ms Suzana Ademi
BEVERLEY PARK NSW 2217
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA as I am satisfied you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, investment manager or custodian, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 9 January 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner
Per Paul Cipolla
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to ensure that the superannuation industry is properly supervised and regulated, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The SIS Act was introduced to address the problem of ensuring that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities are fit and proper persons, thereby maintaining the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system. The Act was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament and its policy objective is to provide a regulatory framework that safeguards the financial interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the proper conduct and management of superannuation entities. In this context, the notice of disqualification issued under the SIS Act serves to uphold the integrity of the superannuation industry by preventing individuals deemed unfit from holding positions of responsibility within superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. This legislation operates under the Commonwealth jurisdiction, thereby encompassing all states and territories within Australia. The Act aims to ensure that those who manage superannuation funds do so in a manner that is consistent with the public interest and the protection of fund members. The disqualification provisions under subsection 126A(3) of the SIS Act allow for the removal of individuals deemed unfit to hold certain roles within the superannuation industry. The notice of disqualification issued to Ms Suzana Ademi signifies that the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation has determined she is not a fit and proper person to serve as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a body corporate involved with superannuation entities. This disqualification order, effective from the date of the notice, reflects the stringent measures the SIS Act employs to uphold the integrity of the superannuation system. Additionally, the Act allows for the revocation of such disqualification orders under specific conditions, offering a mechanism for reconsideration and appeal.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) contains provisions for disqualifying individuals from certain roles within superannuation entities. Section 126A(6) of the Act mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must notify an individual when a decision to disqualify them has been made. In this case, the notice to Ms Suzana Ademi from Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner, informs her that she has been disqualified from being a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a body corporate involved with a superannuation entity. This decision is based on a determination that Ms Ademi is not a fit and proper person for such roles, as stated under section 126A(3).
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. For individuals like Ms Ademi, it requires compliance with the standards set for fitness and propriety in managing superannuation funds. This includes adhering to the regulations and ethical guidelines established to ensure the integrity and protection of superannuation assets. The Act also imposes duties on the Commissioner and their delegates to assess and act on the fitness of individuals involved in the superannuation industry. The disqualification process is designed to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members and to maintain the trust in the superannuation system.
Breaches of the provisions set out in the SIS Act can lead to various civil and criminal consequences. The Act does not specify particular offences related to the disqualification process itself, but the underlying breaches that lead to disqualification can result in penalties. For example, failure to comply with the standards for being a fit and proper person may lead to administrative penalties or legal action. The maximum penalties for breaches under the SIS Act can include substantial fines and, in some cases, imprisonment. The severity of these penalties reflects the critical importance of maintaining the integrity of the superannuation system.
In the event that an individual such as Ms Ademi wishes to challenge the disqualification, the Act provides a mechanism for reconsideration. Under section 344 of the SIS Act, an affected individual may request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving notice. This request must be made in writing and should include the reasons for the reconsideration. This process ensures that individuals have an opportunity to contest decisions that may significantly impact their professional capabilities and reputations.