NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
MS PRISCILLA HALLETT
NORAVILLE
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsections 126A(1) and 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
I have also disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 June 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to regulate the supervision of superannuation entities, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers maintain the highest standards of conduct and compliance. The Act was introduced to address the need for a robust regulatory framework to protect the interests of superannuation fund members, given the significant financial and personal impact that superannuation decisions can have on individuals. This Act is administered by the Commonwealth Parliament, with the objective of maintaining public confidence in the superannuation system by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers are fit and proper persons. The Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who fail to meet these standards, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued under the authority of the Act to Ms Priscilla Hallet Noraville, highlighting the serious nature of the contraventions and the unfitness to continue in such roles.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation funds in Australia. This includes trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities, such as trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) and trustees of industry-managed funds. The Act has a national reach, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, including states and territories. It establishes the standards and requirements for the proper management of superannuation funds, including governance, financial management, and reporting obligations. The Act also provides for the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to manage these funds due to breaches of the Act or other serious misconduct. Exclusions and exemptions may apply to certain types of superannuation entities, such as those covered by other specific legislation, but generally, the Act's scope is comprehensive. The application and enforcement of the Act can be extended or refined through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and guidelines issued by the relevant authorities.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes a provision under section 126A that allows for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unsuitable to act as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. In this case, Priscilla Hallet Noraville has been disqualified under subsections 126A(1) and 126A(3) of the SISA. This means that the decision-maker, Alison Lendon as a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, has determined that Priscilla has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and that these contraventions are serious enough to warrant disqualification. Furthermore, it has been determined that Priscilla is not a fit and proper person to continue in her role. The disqualification takes immediate effect from the date of the notice.
The disqualification under the SISA imposes specific obligations and requirements on Priscilla Hallet Noraville. As a result of the disqualification, she is prohibited from acting as a trustee or a responsible officer of any body corporate that is a trustee of a superannuation entity. This restriction is intended to ensure that individuals who have demonstrated unsuitability do not continue to manage superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of fund members and maintaining the integrity of the superannuation system. Additionally, under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public notification of the decision.
Breaching the disqualification provisions under the SISA can result in significant legal consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the notice, the SISA generally provides for both civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance with its provisions. Civil penalties can include fines, and in some cases, the amount of the fine can be substantial. Criminal penalties might involve imprisonment, reflecting the seriousness with which the law treats breaches related to superannuation management. The exact penalties would depend on the specific nature and severity of the contraventions, as well as any relevant case law and statutory provisions. Furthermore, the disqualification itself can lead to reputational damage and loss of professional credibility, which can have long-term career implications for the disqualified individual.