NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
MRS YATHIDA RATTANAPRAYUL
WILEY PARK NSW 2195
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 5 February 2014
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per Gerard Carney
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry, particularly in light of the growing significance of superannuation funds in the Australian economy. The Act was introduced to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers adhere to high standards of conduct and compliance. This legislative framework aims to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of millions of Australians. The policy objective of the Act is to prevent misconduct and mismanagement within superannuation entities by providing the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who have contravened the provisions of the Act. The Act facilitates the enforcement of compliance and ethical standards within the industry, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed responsibly and in the best interests of members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. This Act is of Commonwealth reach, meaning it applies across Australia and governs the conduct of individuals and entities in the superannuation industry, ensuring compliance with standards designed to protect superannuation benefits. The Act’s scope extends to any person or entity that engages in the management or administration of superannuation funds, which includes any entity involved in the provision of financial products and services associated with superannuation. Notably, the Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions for certain entities or individuals based on the size or nature of their operations within the superannuation industry. However, the Act does allow for the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from acting as trustees or responsible officers if there are serious contraventions. This disqualification can be appealed, and the decision can be reconsidered by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) includes provisions for disqualifying individuals from holding positions such as trustees or responsible officers in superannuation entities. Under section 126A(1), a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify a person from such roles if they are satisfied that the individual has contravened the SIS Act, and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions warrant such action. Section 126A(6) stipulates that the delegate must provide written notice to the disqualified individual, explaining the grounds for the decision, as seen in the notice issued to Mrs Yathid Rattanaprayul. The disqualification order is effective from the date the notice is issued.
The SIS Act imposes various obligations on trustees and responsible officers to ensure compliance with regulatory standards, including proper management of superannuation funds and adherence to the Act's provisions. By disqualifying Mrs Yathid Rattanaprayul, the Act enforces these obligations and aims to prevent future non-compliance by removing her from a position of responsibility within a superannuation entity. The Act mandates that the delegate's decision to disqualify be communicated clearly and in writing, ensuring transparency and accountability in the enforcement process.
In the case of a breach of the SIS Act, the consequences can be significant. Disqualification from holding certain positions is one such consequence, as outlined in section 126A. The Act does not specify monetary penalties for contraventions leading to disqualification but emphasizes the importance of compliance through this enforcement mechanism. Additionally, under section 344, a disqualified individual has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days, providing an opportunity to contest the disqualification and potentially have it revoked.
The publication of the disqualification notice in the Gazette, as required by subsection 126A(7), ensures that the decision is made public, serving as a deterrent to others who might consider contravening the Act. The potential for the disqualification order to be revoked, either on the delegate's initiative or upon written application by the disqualified individual, underscores the Act's balanced approach to enforcement, combining punitive measures with avenues for redress.