NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Thi Cam Hang Le
CHESTER HILL NSW 2162
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being, or acting as:
a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 18 June 2014
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Grivell
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address significant concerns regarding the proper management and regulation of superannuation entities within Australia. This Act was designed to ensure that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation funds operate with integrity and in the best interest of their members. It was introduced by the Australian Parliament with the policy objective of protecting superannuation funds from mismanagement and enhancing the accountability of those who oversee these funds. This legislation aims to maintain the trust and confidence of Australians in the superannuation system by imposing strict regulatory standards and providing mechanisms for enforcement, including the ability to disqualify individuals who have breached the provisions of the Act. The Act provides a framework for the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to supervise and regulate the superannuation industry effectively.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates that perform these roles. The act has a broad jurisdictional reach, as it is a Commonwealth statute and thus applies across Australia. It is designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the integrity and proper management of their funds. The act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals from performing certain roles if they have contravened the act, as demonstrated in the disqualification notice to Mrs Thi Cam Hang Le. The notice specifies that the disqualification is effective from the date of issuance and can be subject to revocation under certain conditions, such as upon application by the disqualified individual or by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. Furthermore, individuals who are dissatisfied with the disqualification decision have the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The notice provided to Mrs Thi Cam Hang Le outlines a decision made under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) to disqualify her from specific roles related to superannuation entities. According to section 126A(6) of the SISA, Mrs Le has been disqualified from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as from being a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles. This disqualification stems from a determination that Mrs Le has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the nature, seriousness, and number of these contraventions justify the disqualification. The disqualification order becomes effective immediately upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the document.
Under the SISA, Mrs Le is now prohibited from engaging in any capacity that involves managing or overseeing superannuation funds. This includes roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian, which are critical to the operation and regulation of superannuation entities. The disqualification extends to her ability to act as a responsible officer of a corporate body that holds these positions. This ensures that Mrs Le cannot indirectly influence or control activities that involve superannuation funds. The decision is a direct consequence of identified breaches of the SISA, which must have been significant enough to warrant such a severe measure.
In accordance with the provisions of the SISA, the notice of disqualification must be published in the Gazette, as outlined in section 126A(7). This public notice serves to inform other relevant parties and the public of the disqualification, ensuring transparency and accountability in the superannuation industry. Additionally, the notice clarifies that the disqualification can be revoked either by the delegate on their own initiative or upon a written application by Mrs Le, as per section 126A(5) of the SISA. This provides Mrs Le with an avenue to potentially have the disqualification lifted if she can demonstrate that the grounds for her disqualification are no longer applicable.
Should Mrs Le be dissatisfied with the decision, she has the right to request a reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing and include the reasons for the dissatisfaction. This provision allows for a review of the decision, potentially leading to its amendment or revocation if the Commissioner determines that the original decision was unjust or based on incorrect information. The structured process ensures that all parties involved have the opportunity to address any grievances or misunderstandings related to the disqualification decision.