NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Susan Kim Brown
North Epping NSW 2121
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 21 November 2013.
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per Gerard Carney
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to address the need for rigorous oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities adhere to stringent standards of conduct and compliance. This legislation was introduced to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by imposing obligations on trustees and other entities involved in the management of superannuation funds. The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 is administered by the Australian Parliament, reflecting the national policy objective of maintaining the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system. This notice of disqualification, issued under the authority of the Act, serves to uphold these objectives by addressing instances of non-compliance and ensuring that individuals who fail to meet the required standards are appropriately disqualified from managing superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of entities that administer superannuation entities, such as self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs). The Act is a Commonwealth legislation, providing a uniform framework across Australia for the supervision of the superannuation industry, and its provisions extend to all states and territories within the Commonwealth. This disqualification notice specifically pertains to Mrs Susan Kim Brown, who has been found to contravene the SIS Act in her capacity as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, leading to her disqualification from holding such a position in the future. The notice outlines the grounds for disqualification and specifies that the order takes immediate effect upon issuance. Additionally, the Act allows for the publication of such disqualification notices in the Gazette, and provides avenues for revocation or reconsideration of the disqualification order by the Commissioner of Taxation.
Key Provisions
The notice provided to Mrs Susan Kim Brown under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) informs her that she has been disqualified from serving as a trustee or responsible officer of a body corporate that manages superannuation entities. This decision was made by Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who asserts that Mrs Brown was a responsible officer when the corporate trustee contravened the SIS Act on multiple occasions. The disqualification is effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice.
The SIS Act imposes several obligations on entities and individuals involved in the management of superannuation funds. Trustees and responsible officers are required to ensure compliance with the Act, which includes adhering to regulations concerning the governance, management, and administration of superannuation entities. Failure to comply with these provisions can result in significant consequences, including the disqualification of individuals from managing such entities. The Act also mandates that trustees must act in the best interests of the members of the superannuation fund and manage the fund with the care of an ordinary prudent person.
Breaching the provisions of the SIS Act can lead to various consequences, including disqualification as outlined in the notice. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SIS Act, the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify individuals based on the nature, seriousness, and number of contraventions. The notice indicates that Mrs Brown's disqualification is effective from the date of the notice, which is 21 November 2013. Additionally, subsection 126A(7) mandates that details of this disqualification will be published in the Gazette. Furthermore, the delegate has the discretion to revoke the disqualification order either on their own initiative or upon receiving a written application from Mrs Brown, as per subsection 126A(5) of the Act.
Should Mrs Brown be dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, she has the right to request a reconsideration from the Commissioner. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should include the reasons for the request, as stipulated in section 344 of the SIS Act. This process allows for a review of the decision, potentially leading to its revocation if the Commissioner finds merit in the grounds for reconsideration.