NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Samantha J Etheridge
HAMPTON VIC 3188
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA as I am satisfied you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 25 March 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner
Per Paul Cipolla
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address issues and gaps within the regulation of superannuation funds, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers uphold high standards of conduct and accountability. This legislation was developed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by providing robust regulatory oversight and mechanisms for addressing misconduct. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from holding positions of responsibility within superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the superannuation system. The policy objective of the SIS Act is to maintain trust and confidence in the superannuation industry by enforcing stringent compliance measures and penalties for non-compliance.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and supervision of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act aims to ensure the proper administration and regulation of superannuation funds in Australia. The disqualification provisions outlined in the Act, such as those referenced in subsection 126A, apply to individuals who have contravened the Act's provisions, with the disqualification becoming effective immediately upon notice being issued. This geographic and jurisdictional reach extends across Australia, as the Act is a Commonwealth legislation. The Act's application may be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which allow for detailed regulations and guidelines to be established. Notably, the Act includes provisions for the revocation of disqualification orders and appeals, ensuring that affected parties have the opportunity to contest decisions through the appropriate channels within specified timeframes.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) relevant to this notice are subsection 126A(6) and subsection 126A(1). Subsection 126A(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must provide a notice of disqualification to the affected party, while subsection 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of a person from being a trustee or responsible officer of certain superannuation entities if they have contravened the Act. In this instance, Alison Lendon, acting as a delegate, has disqualified Mrs Samantha J Etheridge from such roles due to her contraventions of the SIS Act.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the SIS Act on trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities are stringent. Trustees and responsible officers must adhere to fiduciary duties, ensuring that the funds and investments are managed in the best interests of the members. They must also comply with reporting and disclosure requirements, maintain proper records, and act with integrity and in good faith. The SIS Act further stipulates that trustees and responsible officers must not engage in any conduct that could harm the interests of the superannuation members, such as misappropriating funds or making imprudent investments.
In terms of offences and penalties, the SIS Act provides for both civil and criminal sanctions for breaches. Under the civil provisions, trustees and responsible officers who contravene the Act may be subject to fines and other penalties, including pecuniary penalties of up to $210,000 for individuals and $1,050,000 for bodies corporate, as per section 139. Additionally, under the criminal provisions, individuals who wilfully or recklessly contravene the Act may face imprisonment for up to five years, as stipulated in section 138. These penalties underscore the importance of compliance with the Act and the serious consequences that may arise from non-compliance.
Moreover, the SIS Act includes provisions for the revocation of disqualification orders. According to subsection 126A(5), a disqualification order may be revoked either by the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or upon written application by the disqualified person. This provides an avenue for individuals to seek the reconsideration of their disqualification if they believe it was unjust or if their circumstances have changed. Additionally, section 344 of the SIS Act allows for the Commissioner to reconsider a decision if the affected party submits a written request within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, accompanied by reasons for the reconsideration. These provisions ensure that there is a degree of procedural fairness and the opportunity for rectification where necessary.