NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Helen McRae
Croydon VIC 3136
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being, or acting as:
a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 9 January 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Paul Cipolla
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees, investment managers and custodians operate with integrity and competence. The Act is administered by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), which has the authority to disqualify individuals from participating in the superannuation industry if they have contravened the provisions of the Act. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of Australians who rely on superannuation funds for their retirement. The notice provided exemplifies the enforcement mechanisms available under the SISA to address significant contraventions by disqualifying individuals from roles within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation entities, specifically targeting trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation funds. The Act operates under the Commonwealth jurisdiction, and its provisions extend to ensure the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds across Australia. The Act's scope includes any person or corporate entity that engages in the specified roles related to superannuation funds, aiming to protect the interests of fund members. The disqualification powers under the Act allow the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from holding such roles if they are found to have contravened the Act, with the severity of the contraventions being a determining factor. The application of the Act is not limited by geographical boundaries within Australia and includes the power to extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, thereby ensuring flexibility in enforcement. However, specific exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are not detailed in the provided excerpt, and such details would be subject to further examination of the full Act and any relevant regulations or guidelines.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides a framework for the regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia. Under section 126A(6) of the SISA, an individual, such as Mrs Helen McRae, can be disqualified from serving as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or a responsible officer of a body corporate for a superannuation entity if the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation determines that they have contravened the provisions of the Act. This decision to disqualify is communicated through a formal notice, as exemplified in the document dated 9 January 2015, where Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, informs Mrs Helen McRae of her disqualification due to contraventions of the SISA.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on individuals such as Mrs Helen McRae include adherence to the legislative provisions that govern the management and administration of superannuation funds. These obligations encompass duties of care, loyalty, and prudence in managing the funds, as well as compliance with the various regulatory standards and reporting requirements outlined in the SISA. Failure to meet these obligations can lead to disqualification, as evidenced by the notice provided to Mrs Helen McRae, which states that her disqualification is based on the seriousness of her contraventions of the Act.
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 also delineates specific offences, penalties, and consequences for breach of its provisions. For example, section 126A(1) empowers the delegate to disqualify an individual who has contravened the Act, and such a disqualification is effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice. Furthermore, the disqualification can be revoked under certain conditions, either on the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by the disqualified individual, as per subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. In addition, section 344 of the Act allows for the reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected individual submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, outlining the reasons for the request. The Act does not specify maximum penalties for contraventions directly, but the disqualification itself serves as a significant deterrent and consequence for non-compliance.