NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Vishnuvardhanre Reddygari
WENTWORTHVILLE NSW 2145
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being, or acting as:
a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, investment manager or custodian, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 19 August 2014
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bernard Morrison
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues related to the regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that it operates in the best interests of its members and beneficiaries. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament to fill the gap in comprehensive regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation members and beneficiaries by establishing a robust regulatory framework. The SISA aims to ensure that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities are fit and proper persons, thereby maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. This notice of disqualification is issued under the authority of the SISA, reflecting the policy objective of safeguarding the financial security of superannuation fund members through stringent regulation of industry participants.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation entities, such as trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates that undertake these roles. The disqualification notice issued to Mr Vishnuvardhanre Reddygari specifies that he has been disqualified from acting in any of these capacities within the superannuation industry. The jurisdictional reach of the Act extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, meaning that the disqualification applies nationally. The notice, issued by Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, is grounded in the Act’s provisions, particularly subsection 126A(6), and is effective immediately upon issuance. The decision to disqualify Mr Reddygari is based on a determination that he is not a fit and proper person to hold such positions under the SISA. This decision may be subject to revocation or reconsideration as outlined in the Act, including potential publication of the disqualification notice in the Gazette and the option for the disqualified person to request a reconsideration within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context include subsection 126A(6) (referenced in the notice), which requires a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to give a notice of disqualification to the individual concerned, and subsection 126A(3), which allows for the disqualification of an individual if it is determined that they are not a fit and proper person to manage superannuation entities. The disqualification order is effective from the date the notice is made, as stipulated in the notice to Mr Vishnuvardhanre Reddygari.
Under this Act, the obligations and requirements imposed on the parties or entities it governs are primarily focused on ensuring that individuals who manage superannuation funds are deemed fit and proper for the role. The Act requires that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation assess whether an individual is suitable to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a body corporate managing superannuation entities. If the delegate is satisfied that an individual is not fit and proper, they must provide a notice of disqualification, as detailed in the notice to Mr Reddygari. This process is intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and ensure the integrity of the superannuation industry.
In terms of offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach, the Act provides mechanisms for disqualification from roles within the superannuation industry. The notice given to Mr Reddygari indicates that he has been disqualified from acting in certain capacities due to being deemed not a fit and proper person. There is no specific mention of financial penalties in the notice itself; however, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualification on the initiative of the delegate or on written application by the disqualified individual, as per subsection 126A(5). Additionally, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse for individuals to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided that the request is made in writing and includes reasons for the dissatisfaction with the decision. The notice does not specify any maximum penalties for breach but implies that failure to comply with the disqualification order could result in further legal action or repercussions within the framework of the Act.