NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
MR Trung Van Tran
FAIRFIELD HEIGHTS NSW 2165
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made the decision to disqualify you from being, or acting as:
- A trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
- A responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of contraventions provides grounds to disqualify you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 19 January 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Kwee Tang
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to establish a framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation members and beneficiaries. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with powers to disqualify individuals from certain roles within the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the Act, ensuring that only individuals of good standing manage superannuation funds. This disqualification mechanism is intended to maintain the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation system. The policy objective underlying the Act is to safeguard the financial security of superannuation members by preventing those with a history of non-compliance or misconduct from holding positions of responsibility within the industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner to take decisive action against individuals who fail to comply with the legislative requirements, thereby upholding the standards of conduct expected within the superannuation sector.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities in Australia, imposing obligations on these individuals and entities to ensure compliance with the Act’s provisions. The Act’s reach extends across the Commonwealth, ensuring that all superannuation entities and their officers operating within Australia must adhere to its regulations. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals from holding roles in superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened its provisions, with the decision to disqualify being made by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The disqualification can be initiated under subsection 126A(1) of the Act if there are grounds based on the nature, seriousness, and number of contraventions. Once a disqualification is made, it takes immediate effect, and the delegate may also choose to revoke the disqualification either on their own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified person. Furthermore, affected individuals have the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification, issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), informs Mr Trung Van Tran that he has been disqualified from serving as a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that operates in these capacities. This decision was made by James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who is satisfied that Mr Tran has contravened the SISA on multiple occasions. The seriousness and cumulative nature of these contraventions justify the disqualification, which becomes effective on the day of its issuance.
The SISA imposes specific obligations on trustees, investment managers and custodians of superannuation entities, including the requirement to manage funds prudently and in the best interests of members. Mr Tran's disqualification arises from his failure to adhere to these obligations, leading to the determination that his continued involvement in the superannuation industry could pose a risk to fund members. The notice specifies that this disqualification is a direct consequence of Mr Tran's contravention of the SISA and is designed to protect the integrity of the superannuation system.
In addition to the immediate effect of the disqualification, the notice also informs Mr Tran that particulars of this decision will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as required by subsection 126A(7) of the SISA. This public notice serves to inform other stakeholders and the public of the disqualification. Furthermore, the notice indicates that the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Mr Tran. This provides a potential pathway for Mr Tran to seek reinstatement should he meet the necessary criteria.
Lastly, the notice outlines the recourse available to Mr Tran if he is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision. Under section 344 of the SISA, Mr Tran has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration request must include the reasons for the dissatisfaction. This provision ensures that Mr Tran has a formal mechanism to challenge the decision and seek a resolution.