NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – MR STEPHEN MOORE
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Stephen Moore
KALEEN ACT 2617
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contravention you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 October 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Heather Reinke
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address significant issues within the superannuation industry, including the need for robust supervision and governance to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to fill a gap in the regulatory framework by providing a comprehensive set of rules and standards to ensure the proper administration and management of superannuation funds. One of the key provisions of the Act is its ability to disqualify individuals from acting as responsible officers if they are found to have contravened the Act, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the superannuation system. This legislative measure aims to maintain public confidence in superannuation entities and to prevent misconduct and mismanagement within the industry. The disqualification process is a critical tool in enforcing compliance and holding individuals accountable for breaches of the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and corporate entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds in Australia, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act has national jurisdictional reach, applying across the Commonwealth, states, territories, and affecting conduct and transactions related to superannuation entities. This disqualification notice pertains specifically to Mr Stephen Moore, a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, who has been found to contravene the SISA, leading to his disqualification. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice. The Act allows for potential revocation of disqualification under certain conditions and provides avenues for reconsideration by the Commissioner of Taxation. Furthermore, the Act imposes strict penalties, including a maximum of two years' imprisonment, for disqualified individuals who continue to engage in prohibited activities.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context pertain primarily to sections 126A and 126K. Section 126A(2) provides the basis for disqualifying a responsible officer of a corporate trustee who has allowed or contributed to contraventions of the Act, particularly if the seriousness of those contraventions warrants such action. This is coupled with subsection 126A(6), which mandates that a written notice of disqualification be provided to the affected individual. In this case, Mr. Stephen Moore has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, based on the contraventions committed by the corporate trustee he was associated with at the time.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Most critically, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with all provisions of the SISA to avoid any potential disqualification. Additionally, they are required to act in the best interests of the superannuation fund members and must maintain high standards of conduct and governance. The Act also mandates that any contraventions be reported and addressed promptly to avoid further regulatory action.
The SISA outlines specific offences and penalties for breaches, as noted in section 126K. It is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds these roles. The maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act regards compliance and the protection of superannuation fund members' interests. Moreover, the disqualification notice itself is subject to publication under subsection 126A(7), ensuring transparency and accountability.
For Mr. Stephen Moore, the disqualification takes immediate effect upon the issuance of the notice. However, the SISA provides pathways for potential revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Mr. Moore. Furthermore, section 344 allows for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if Mr. Moore believes the decision is unjust. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice, providing a clear and time-bound process for appeal.