NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Scott Parkinson
CHAPEL HILL QLD 4069
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being, or acting as:
a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, investment manager or custodian, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 28 January 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bernard Morrison
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that it operates efficiently and in the best interests of members. This legislation was introduced to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of superannuation entities, their trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers, with a focus on maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The SISA is administered by the Australian Parliament and its policy objective is to protect superannuation members by ensuring the proper management of their funds and by disqualifying unfit individuals from roles that involve significant responsibilities within the superannuation sector. In the context of the disqualification notice issued under this Act, the policy objective is to safeguard the superannuation industry from potential misconduct or unsuitability by removing individuals who do not meet the required standards of fitness and propriety.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a Commonwealth legislation that governs the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation fund members. This Act applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates that act in these capacities. The geographic reach of the Act extends across the nation, with its provisions applicable to all superannuation entities operating within Australia. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, as evidenced by the disqualification of Mr. Scott Parkinson under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA. The disqualification order becomes effective immediately upon issuance. Notably, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualification orders either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon application by the disqualified person. Additionally, any affected individual dissatisfied with the decision has the right to request a reconsideration within 21 days from the date of notification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes a provision under section 126A(6) that allows for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to hold certain roles within superannuation entities. In this case, Mr Scott Parkinson has been issued a notice of disqualification under subsection 126A(3), which prevents him from acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds these roles. This decision was made by Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who is satisfied that Mr Parkinson does not meet the requirements to be considered a fit and proper person for such positions. The disqualification becomes effective immediately upon the issuance of this notice.
The SISA imposes specific obligations on individuals and entities involved in superannuation management. For trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates, these roles require adherence to the standards set out in the Act, including the maintenance of appropriate professional standards and compliance with all relevant laws and regulations. Failure to meet these standards can result in disqualification, as evidenced by Mr Parkinson’s case. Additionally, entities that fail to ensure their trustees, investment managers, or custodians are fit and proper persons may also face repercussions under the Act.
Under the SISA, breaches of the disqualification order or failure to comply with the Act's provisions can lead to serious consequences. Section 344 of the SISA allows individuals who are affected by such disqualification to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration must be in writing and include reasons for the request. Furthermore, the Act provides mechanisms for the revocation of disqualification orders, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified individual. Non-compliance with these provisions can lead to civil or criminal penalties, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach. However, the specific penalties are not detailed in the notice and would require further examination of the SISA.