NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Peter J Ingram
Mornington TAS 7018
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 25 November 2013.
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per Gerard Carney
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to provide for the supervision of superannuation entities, their trustees, and investment managers, with the overarching goal of protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent regulation and oversight within the superannuation industry to ensure compliance and prevent misconduct. The Act was passed by the Australian Parliament, reflecting a commitment to safeguarding retirement savings and maintaining public trust in the superannuation system. The policy objective of the SIS Act is to promote the efficient, honest, and economical administration of superannuation entities, thereby ensuring that members' benefits are preserved and managed responsibly.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. This legislation extends its jurisdiction across Australia, impacting those within the superannuation industry regardless of state or territory borders. The disqualification order issued under this Act applies specifically to Mr. Peter J. Ingram, who has been found to contravene the provisions of the SIS Act while serving as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee. The disqualification is based on the nature, seriousness, and number of contraventions, indicating a significant breach of the Act. The decision to disqualify Mr. Ingram takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice, as mandated by the SIS Act. Additionally, the disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette, ensuring transparency and public record of the decision. There are provisions within the Act for potential revocation of the disqualification order either by the authority or upon application by Mr. Ingram, along with avenues for reconsideration by the Commissioner of Taxation if he is dissatisfied with the decision.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) contains provisions for disqualifying individuals from serving as trustees or responsible officers of entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds. Section 126A(2) of the SIS Act allows for the disqualification of such individuals if it is determined that the entity they were associated with has contravened the Act and that the individual's role during the contraventions justifies their disqualification. In the case of Mr Peter J Ingram, Ivan Parrett, as a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, has exercised this authority based on the seriousness and frequency of the corporate trustee's contraventions.
Under the SIS Act, the primary obligation for trustees and responsible officers is to ensure compliance with the statutory requirements governing superannuation funds. This includes adherence to financial and reporting standards, duty of care, and the proper management of fund assets. The disqualification process underscores the importance of these obligations, highlighting the potential consequences of failing to uphold them. Mr Ingram, having been identified as a responsible officer during the contraventions, now faces restrictions on his ability to participate in the management of superannuation entities.
The consequences of contravening the SIS Act can be severe, as outlined in the disqualification notice. The disqualification order against Mr Ingram is effective immediately upon issuance of the notice, as stated in subsection 126A(6) of the Act. This immediate effect means that Mr Ingram is no longer permitted to serve in any capacity that involves the management or oversight of superannuation funds. The notice also mentions that particulars of this disqualification will be published in the Gazette, which serves to inform the public and relevant stakeholders of the decision.
There are avenues for Mr Ingram to seek reconsideration of the disqualification order. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Mr Ingram himself. Additionally, if Mr Ingram is dissatisfied with the decision, he can request the Commissioner to reconsider it in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice, as per section 344 of the SIS Act. This provision allows for a formal review process, providing a potential opportunity for Mr Ingram to contest the disqualification.